![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() Joined Nov 15, '08 From Hollywood Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
has anyone ever succesfully turned a coupe into a hatch? or is it even possible?
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 18, '08 From Houston Currently Offline Reputation: 7 (100%) ![]() |
if anything, vert to coupe, not to hatch. the verts start as coupes. we've got alot of similarities, but in no way is the roof the only difference. Us verts got different framing structures to support our lack of roof support, the hatch just has a wider rear paneling, but the framing is the same as the coupe. verts got this wierd O-hole looking rear framing support, opposed to the beams. Atleast mine does ![]() ![]() -------------------- QUOTE (presure2 @ Nov 6, 2010 - 6:16 AM) Via FB: fcuking awsome!!! D-man FTW! Damn D-Man - most impressive. D-Man's post should be a sticky LOL, oh boy, you can always count on D-Man for ridiculously hilarious posts. |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jun 29, '03 From 캘리포니아 Currently Offline Reputation: 23 (100%) ![]() |
if anything, vert to coupe, not to hatch. the verts start as coupes. we've got alot of similarities, but in no way is the roof the only difference. Us verts got different framing structures to support our lack of roof support, the hatch just has a wider rear paneling, but the framing is the same as the coupe. verts got this wierd O-hole looking rear framing support, opposed to the beams. Atleast mine does ![]() ![]() Actually, presure is right, the verts all started out as coupes and they were shipped from Japan to a place in Southern California where they underwent their transformation. All of the Convertibles were built off of GT coupes, that's why the Convertible didn't come out until 95, when the hatch and coupe were released in 94. The reinforcement on the convertibles were done to retain the original stability of the coupe (while the top is up ofcourse). The rear end on the convertible has extreme reinforcement to be able to maintain it's structural integrity even when the top is down. -------------------- |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 18, '08 From Houston Currently Offline Reputation: 7 (100%) ![]() |
if anything, vert to coupe, not to hatch. the verts start as coupes. we've got alot of similarities, but in no way is the roof the only difference. Us verts got different framing structures to support our lack of roof support, the hatch just has a wider rear paneling, but the framing is the same as the coupe. verts got this wierd O-hole looking rear framing support, opposed to the beams. Atleast mine does ![]() ![]() Actually, presure is right, the verts all started out as coupes and they were shipped from Japan to a place in Southern California where they underwent their transformation. All of the Convertibles were built off of GT coupes, that's why the Convertible didn't come out until 95, when the hatch and coupe were released in 94. The reinforcement on the convertibles were done to retain the original stability of the coupe (while the top is up ofcourse). The rear end on the convertible has extreme reinforcement to be able to maintain it's structural integrity even when the top is down. True. and all of this is well known. However structure isn't the only modifications made. It truely is a whole new car trim. But i see the comparison that you are trying to make. But to even attempt to convert a Vert to a Coupe is nowhere near worth the quality and cost (savings) that you would have by simply purchasing a coupe. While the 6th gens were in production it may have been cost effective to convert coupes to verts, however today, it is not. Nor the vice versa. That is all that I am saying. Keeping in mind that structe isn't the only thing modified. our speaker panels were redesigned, our speakers themselfs were positioned stright across instead of angled ![]() All i'm saying is that a conversion (from any trim to any trim) isn't worth it. -------------------- QUOTE (presure2 @ Nov 6, 2010 - 6:16 AM) Via FB: fcuking awsome!!! D-man FTW! Damn D-Man - most impressive. D-Man's post should be a sticky LOL, oh boy, you can always count on D-Man for ridiculously hilarious posts. |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 21st, 2025 - 1:26 PM |