350z or s2000 |
350z or s2000 |
Dec 12, 2008 - 9:53 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 5, '06 From dallas tx. Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
I like them both they both have there pro and cons and i will be buying of theses cars soon hopefully just thought i would get some more ideas of what people think about one or the other comments about why one would be better then the other would be great ......
thanks PS. if i get the s2000 i will be buying the hard top for it so think of both of theses cars as coupes and the perches of the hard top although it is expensive is not a factor in witch one i will buy ..... this is based on looks, performance, maintenance and things along that line ...... Luis |
Dec 12, 2008 - 10:18 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 2, '07 From Manitoba, Canada Currently Offline Reputation: 6 (100%) |
s2000 hands down, its over 500 lbs lighter
no torque, but crazy high redline |
Dec 12, 2008 - 10:52 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 5, '06 From dallas tx. Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
s2000 hands down, its over 500 lbs lighter no torque, but crazy high redline yes s2000 are 500 lbs lighter but the 350z makes up for it with 270hp - 300hp depending on the year and i have heard 350z are faster 350z hands down. My friend bought an s2k and let me drive it. For like the first hour we were trying to figure out what was wrong with it. You would step on the gas and the car just didnt go anywhere. We were thinking maybe it had traction control. Then we realized that the car just had zero torque and we were used to turbo cars... lol. Seriously, get the 350z. At least it has some balls. I have test drove both of them and i have to say i was not impressed with s2k at the start once i got to the higher rpm's it was pretty fun but before that didn'f feel to much |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 26th, 2024 - 3:33 PM |