Found this pretty funny, Integra VS Celi Thread |
Found this pretty funny, Integra VS Celi Thread |
Oct 15, 2009 - 5:53 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 6, '09 From Bergen County,NJ Currently Offline Reputation: 10 (100%) |
A friend of mine told me something about a H22 powered 6g and I just had to Google it. Never found it but while looking I came across a Supra forum discussing which is better between the Integ and Celi. Pretty funny what people post, I'm a die-hard Honda enthusiast, not because of what I see on the streets but of what they do on professional circuits and events. But the idiots on that board remind me why I hate having one.
ummm let me just give you guys the link....... http://www.supraforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=532666 -------------------- 1996 Toyota Celica ST 25th Anni. Edition #461
|
Oct 18, 2009 - 7:09 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 23, '05 From Kansas City Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
After owning a Prelude Si and several Celicas, I have to say I prefer the Celica. The Prelude's steering felt numb, and the car sucked on gravel and off-road. Plus it got horrible gas mileage for a 2.3 litre that required premium. And the thing weighed in at over 3000 pounds, pretty heavy for a small car IMO.
Our Celicas, on the other hand, may not have the power but I feel like my car handles much better than any Civic or Prelude I've driven, on road or off, minus the new Civic Si's (one Honda I would own). But we all already know this -------------------- 1999 Celica GT
|
Oct 18, 2009 - 9:11 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 20, '07 From Bakersfield, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 10 (100%) |
After owning a Prelude Si and several Celicas, I have to say I prefer the Celica. The Prelude's steering felt numb, and the car sucked on gravel and off-road. Plus it got horrible gas mileage for a 2.3 litre that required premium. And the thing weighed in at over 3000 pounds, pretty heavy for a small car IMO. Our Celicas, on the other hand, may not have the power but I feel like my car handles much better than any Civic or Prelude I've driven, on road or off, minus the new Civic Si's (one Honda I would own). But we all already know this LOL Celica may not have the power vs a prelude? oh that reminds me of an incident I encountered last night with a friend from school who caught me on a street at a stop sign and made a suggestion that resulted in utter embarrassment for him in front of his friends, yet gained a new respect for Toyotas. This post has been edited by Random_Stranger: Oct 18, 2009 - 9:12 PM -------------------- 91 MR2 Turbo SW20, 92 MR2 Turbo SW20, 95 Celica GT ST204
|
Oct 18, 2009 - 11:41 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 23, '05 From Kansas City Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
After owning a Prelude Si and several Celicas, I have to say I prefer the Celica. The Prelude's steering felt numb, and the car sucked on gravel and off-road. Plus it got horrible gas mileage for a 2.3 litre that required premium. And the thing weighed in at over 3000 pounds, pretty heavy for a small car IMO. Our Celicas, on the other hand, may not have the power but I feel like my car handles much better than any Civic or Prelude I've driven, on road or off, minus the new Civic Si's (one Honda I would own). But we all already know this LOL Celica may not have the power vs a prelude? oh that reminds me of an incident I encountered last night with a friend from school who caught me on a street at a stop sign and made a suggestion that resulted in utter embarrassment for him in front of his friends, yet gained a new respect for Toyotas. Yeah, Celica doesn't have the power of the Prelude. They Prelude's F22 has 135 hp, about the same as a 5sfe, but the H23 in the Si has 160 hp at the crank and the H22 Vtec puts out 190 hp at the crank. I don't know which your friend had, but I'm guessing it was an F22 and/or he doesn't know how to drive. And remember the Celica is a bit lighter, but not enough to compensate for the power difference. -------------------- 1999 Celica GT
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 30th, 2024 - 11:37 AM |