This is what it has come down to, sorry for my threads, but I am lost |
This is what it has come down to, sorry for my threads, but I am lost |
Nov 27, 2009 - 1:27 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 20, '07 From Bakersfield, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 10 (100%) |
Seriously guys, I cannot decide. I only plan on throwing down around $3.5k on one of these and because the SC300 falls within my price range here in California, has given me another option to look at. I wanted another (eventually) project car that must remain as a daily driver until my conversion is complete next year before I can really touch it. So I just wanted to see what your thoughts are. I honestly am getting anxious to just grab another car, although no real MR2's are coming my way.
N/A's are going as low as $1300 up to $2600, MR2 Turbos have too much stuff on them that folks are selling and going for $6k and higher. I know there has to be some available in between, so this poll is basically asking if I should wait. Or if I should just go ahead and grab a SC300. -------------------- 91 MR2 Turbo SW20, 92 MR2 Turbo SW20, 95 Celica GT ST204
|
Nov 27, 2009 - 8:52 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 18, '08 Currently Offline Reputation: 3 (100%) |
I would get the sc300 cause it different and yet your still in the Toyota Family, i had the sc400 and it was alot of fun and being auto haha it was still fast. they looks amazing when they are done right and looking fresh.
just my opinion. though. i mean if you was to get a mr2 that is basically like the celica, then why not have kept the celica then right? When i sold my sc400 i thought about getting a 89-92 supra but went for the celica cause it was different chassis and drive but still in the toyota family. This post has been edited by Tech-Nics: Nov 27, 2009 - 8:54 PM |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: December 4th, 2024 - 3:41 PM |