Bin Laden dead, Bought the farm |
Bin Laden dead, Bought the farm |
May 1, 2011 - 10:22 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 5, '05 From pineapple under the sea Currently Offline Reputation: 9 (100%) |
Finally.
Discuss. -------------------- 1991 MR2 - T-tops - Crimson Red - Gen3 3SGTE - Lots of money
I'm not really an asshole, but I play one on the internet. **** Photobucket |
May 3, 2011 - 9:16 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 10, '03 From Connecticut Currently Offline Reputation: 11 (100%) |
What was the real reason? The war and the economy downturn are 2 separate occurrences, they aren't related. Pics will eventually link on to the internet, but can the conspiracy theories please stop? economy has EVERYTHING to do with war good buddy, Economy = money Wars cost money... what dont we have at the moment? money. money into something more constructive than chasing a guy around and loosing 4400 american soliers on top of the people we lost on 9/11 aint worth that dirtbag bin laden. I just wont believe that the WTC can fall down on its self PERFECTLY after only burning a couple hours. not to mention several friends of mine live not too far from WTC, and they told me they heard the explosions THEN the building went down. but im not going to start with the conspiracy theories.... You just lost all credibility with me. You're one of those "Loose Change" believers huh? In 2001 when we were attacked, we retaliated. The economy wasn't a factor in this decision. There wasn't a choice. 8 years later the economy takes a ****, and you what, want to up and leave the area? You can't just do that. You can't go in looking for blood and leave without it. We went in for Osama, and weren't going to leave until we had him. Iraq was bull****, we can all agree on that. Those 4400, well 4424 to be exact, were Operation Iraqi Freedom, not Operation Enduring Freedom, which was the Afghan mission. We lost 1,461 in Afghanistan. Those 4424 were unnecessary, and I was/am totally against going into Iraq. It was based on lies and that isn't up for debate. You already started with conspiracy theories. There were NO explosives in the WTC, the buildings fell down, not perfectly, they fell. Did you want them to fall down like a tree or something? Do actually think the Pentagon was hit with a missile? You people say "don't believe what the government tells you" but you believe a video made by some kid from Oneonta, NY. I lived in Oneonta, or it's monicre: Stoneonta, and that's enough to keep me skeptical. To seriously believe that the government had a hand in 4 planes being hijacked, 2 driven into the tallest buildings in NYC, killing thousands, just to what... start a war? Get oil? It's ludicrous. It's ludicrous to think such a terrible event was orchestrated by MANY people who didn't have a problem with it, and didn't come out and say YES this was all so-and-so's idea. Eyewitnesses said they heard explosions? Eyewitnesses see UFOs, Bigfoot, Nessie, ghosts, and what else have you on a daily basis. Cliff notes: Osama is dead, we killed him. Why wasn't he already? Because a$$holes like that never die soon enough. 9/11 wasn't a conspiracy. This post has been edited by Supersprynt: May 3, 2011 - 9:30 AM -------------------- |
May 3, 2011 - 1:05 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 15, '10 From The Best Coast Currently Offline Reputation: 12 (100%) |
You can't go in looking for blood and leave without it. Obviously you can.That war in the 60s proved that. I think Osama was not killed 2 days ago, i don't doubt that he may actually be dead, but it wasn't 2 days ago. The whole "omg 9/11 was all the government" conspiracy is BS, i mean its been almost 10 years and no one has found any hard evidence linking any government agency to the terrorists. Do I think the government had anything to do with it?no. Do i think they used it in their own best interests to invade the middle east.Yes. This post has been edited by SupraKid: May 3, 2011 - 1:06 PM |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 23rd, 2024 - 5:27 AM |