![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 4, '10 From Bronx NY Currently Offline Reputation: 3 (100%) ![]() |
is the 4th gen 3sgte a strong engine...better power over the others?
-------------------- Always fast and going for the look......
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 11, '08 From Auckland, New Zealand Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
If pistons were taller using the same bore and stroke you would have higher compression but less cc's.
1998cc and 86mm*86mm seems to be consistent throughout all 3s-* motors. -------------------- Mike W
1996 Toyota Celica ST205 GT-FOUR GT2860RS turbine, TiAL mvr44, JE 86.5φ piston, Clutchmasters FX400, APEX P-FC 269awhp / 273ft-lbs |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 18, '05 From Calgary Currently Offline Reputation: 20 (100%) ![]() |
If pistons were taller using the same bore and stroke you would have higher compression but less cc's. 1998cc and 86mm*86mm seems to be consistent throughout all 3s-* motors. the bore and stroke is what determines the cc's. the volume between the top of the piston at TDC and head have nothing to do with it. you can verify it by doing this: π * [(8.6cm/2)^2] * 8.6cm * 4 cylinders = 1998 cc's taller pistons (or longer rods) will just shift the stroke closer to the head resulting in higher compression but won't affect its cc's. -------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 25th, 2025 - 8:07 AM |