cone filter - does it really make a difference?, newb questions |
cone filter - does it really make a difference?, newb questions |
Jan 2, 2007 - 12:48 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 14, '06 From Northampton, UK Currently Offline Reputation: 5 (100%) |
Hi,
I notice that most members' cars have a cone filter fitted. I picked up an unbranded burgandy red cone filter for a couple of pounds at my local scrappy. It looks brand new. Considering using it on my Celica, but does it really make a difference over the stock Toyota panel filter? Perhaps I should look at a K&N panel filter to go in the stock air filter box? Also, being in the UK and as my Celica is my daily drive, the engine bay gets quite damp, salty and grubby. How do cone filters cope with water and dirt build-up? Should I be looking to box the cone filter in a similar way to the stock air filter box? Finally, where is a good place to fit a mass air flow sensor with the stock setup and with the cone filter fitted? This post has been edited by BloodyStupidDavey: Jun 16, 2007 - 12:03 PM -------------------- Davey
Items for sale |
Jun 16, 2011 - 5:29 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 15, '02 From Tasmania(Australia) Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Ignoring the fact that a pod filter (as they are called in aus) suck in hot air when they are just kicking around in an engine bay (and not in an airbox where they get cold air only) can ONLY give you a power increase because of one or both of the following reasons (put simply). (also assuming the stock airbox is a reasonably well designed bit of kit, which most modern stuff is, expecially for lightly modded cars, most manufacturers are a lot smarter then us after all).
If the pod has a larger surface area (for the sake of the point assume the pod filter has the same filtering ability as the OE panel filter in its box), so larger filtering surface area = less restriction for the engine = slight power increase If the pod filter less filtering ability (for the sake of the argument assume the pod is the same or smaller filter surface area as the OE panel filter in its box), this is not desirable, less filtering ability = dirty air = engine is eating sh!t Im in the process of doing an experiment to prove a point to all the pod filter ricers out there. I have the OE panel filter from my 205 im going to cut appart and stretch out to its full size, then calculate the filter surface area, then do the same for just a generic pod filter. Im reasonably confident the panel will have a larger area. Most people will "say" they get a power increase from fitting a pod, but most of the time its placebo effect from induction noise, and the "hope" they get an increase. If they do get actual dyno proven power gains (remember dynos are usually done with the bonnet up, not the usual frontal airflow seen when driving, so actual results might differ from on the street) Then you have to wonder have they gained power from having a larger surface area or filtering less? Following on from that how many people are replacing a reasonably new (and therefore not restrictive) OE filter with their fully sick pod filter? My guess is not many, usually it will be an old dirty restrictive OE filter, meaning the same or better gain would also be achieved with a new OE filter. Here is a quick link that a guy did on a uzz30 soarer comparing pressure drop comparing dirty filters, to clean ones, to k&n drop in panels etc. Also modifying/replacing the stock airbox with an improved model. planet soarer test Its been mentioned about dry vs wet filters, naturally if you have an afm or maf then running an oiled filter is going to result in oil getting on the electronics, possibly causing incorrect readings = car running **** etc. Oiled filters bring another issue, since they require maintenance failing to do so reduces its ability to filter meaning you will be sucking in dirty air. Conversly over oiling means you will have excellent filtering but you will be sucking extra oil into the engine, and proving a bigger restriction then necessary. (for those that dont know the process for a K&N is to buy their "filter cleaning kit" (ahem further costs), first you spray the cleaner stuff onto the filter, let it soak in for a few minutes, then wash out with water. Let that dry completly, then you spray the oil onto the filter. I'de like to think most people aren't idiots and know when to stop spraying the oil on, but its simply not the case. Just FYI yes im running pod filters on my 205, its 2x apexi pods (multiple tests on the net show apexi pods are about the best for filtering of the aftermarket ones). Im running 2 pods to help with the "restriction" and they are housed in a custom airbox only getting cold air (headlight intake). In the chaser ive got an apexi panel (because it was on sale, i wont hesitate to use a toyota filter when its due), JZX100 Chasers have a MAF so im not going to be using an oiled filter. End rant This post has been edited by Cuts_the_Pilot: Jun 16, 2011 - 5:41 AM -------------------- ST205 Group A Rallye GT-Four, #61 of 77............600hp GT3582r
GRX133 Toyota Mark X 350s |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 30th, 2024 - 7:09 PM |