Aerodynamic panels, questions/ideas for improving CD and mpg of 6g |
Aerodynamic panels, questions/ideas for improving CD and mpg of 6g |
Aug 14, 2011 - 9:07 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 3, '11 From Ohio Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
Has anyone ever heard of addition panels to improve the coefficient of drag (cd) of our cars? Sites like ecomodder have all the people making stupid looking stuff to gain mpg, but imo our cars look too good for that to happen. So I was thinking, what if we made panels that either A) looked good on the car, or B) couldn't be "readily seen" - aka made out of lexan or something.
Any Thoughts, ideas? I think if we could shape some clear panels to deflect air around our bucket head lights, and some to keep the air off the spoiler (but still using the spoiler for mounting/looks), we could probably gain at least a few mpg. It might be worth looking into if some cheap lexan could be found. -------------------- |
Aug 14, 2011 - 9:12 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 22, '07 From Houston, TX Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) |
underbody panels would be the first thing id look into. really thin aluminum would deflect the wind and keep the weight down, plus protect the underbody from elements (not much for collision as theyd have to be thicker = weight = loss in mpg)
-------------------- QUOTE "And, as always, your friendship, help, and dedication to the advancement of Texas Celica dominance is GREATLY appreciated. Thanks bro." -DEATH 1994 GT: V6 swap, 5speed E53 W/ LSD, All Power, now RED 1995 ST: SOLD @273k miles, Auto, all power, CarPC, White 1994 ST: Totaled, 5spd, all power, Red RIP 07/09/09 @ 241,810 1994 Lexus LS400: This is my new DD |
Aug 14, 2011 - 9:18 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 3, '11 From Ohio Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
underbody panels would be the first thing id look into. really thin aluminum would deflect the wind and keep the weight down, plus protect the underbody from elements (not much for collision as theyd have to be thicker = weight = loss in mpg) That has crossed my mind as well. Its not like the underside of our cars are extremely rough anyway, but I think if we made an underbody panel that was "dimpled" like a golf ball then we might be ahead. The dimpling creates a turbulent boundary layer of air(which is why golf balls are rough), and as you can imagine, air sliding past air is less friction than air past metal. Wonder what $$ would look like on that.... -------------------- |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: January 10th, 2025 - 4:01 PM |