![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 3, '06 From Czech Republic (Europe) Currently Offline Reputation: 56 (100%) ![]() |
At last I had chance to test GT86.... Car I hate
![]() Anyway back to the point. Back to my experience from the last weekend. Now you know I do not like that car so really wanted to see it fall in my eyes ![]() - see drag race between GT86 and Celica GT-S (T23 Sport) - drive GT86 - "drift" GT86 (drift means to loose grip when cornering for me ![]() - talk to other GT, ST Celica drivers and ask about opinion... ...to make as much as unbiased conclusion about GT86. First what "numbers say". When taking curb weight, power (or torque) and loss between engine and the ground (that is important) for all models of Celica (T20, T23 - all European versions) and GT86, than just converting to percentage value (to easily compare it) you receive some interesting answers. Lets say GT86 is "standard" (100% value) than: 6gen ST = power 58%, torque 76% GT = power 80%, torque 85% GT-Four = power 86%**, torque 103%* 7gen GT = power 78%, torque 91%** GT-S = power 94%*, torque 87% *highest value **second highest value From you see above theory say GT-S has no chance to win drag race with GT86 (lower torque means lower ability to start fast enough and almost the same power gives zero chance to catch what GT-S loose with slower acceleration). And reality is exactly as numbers say. I have seen two drag races between GT-S and GT86. Both won by GT86. Also numbers can help to guess what was experience of other drivers and why in fact just GT-S drivers accepted challenge to race GT86. ST owners were all impressed with GT86. To have suddenly for 40% more power and 25% more torque than they are used to have (especially on rear wheels) knocked them down all ![]() Numbers also say only at least competitors for GT86 were: 7gen. GT = just slightly lower torque so in case track is short enough and GT86 mess up take off 7gen GT can win. Unfortunately no one tried his luck. 7gen. GT-S = slightly less power in combination with long enough track ...and GT86's messed up take off also gave some chances to win. As I saw not happened. GT86 in both races lead from take off to finish. 6gen. GT-Four = unfortunately none was available around. Any stock GT-Four has higher torque so should lead from the start for 100%. On too long track may loose in the end (thanks to weight and too high loss between engine and wheels). But you never know till you see ![]() NOTE: Some people may say now: "you were there! You have GT-four so you could race GT86!" No, no... all wrong. I have SS-Four... so I could not ![]() To driving/"drifting" impressions. Since my feelings are "calibrated" to my car result was exactly what I expected. Not enough power, pitiful torque. Take off is effective (when your ass shakes with behind spinning rear wheels it is always effective ![]() ![]() Now I need to slightly re-evaluate my opinion about GT86. I do not hate it as a car anymore (or lets say not that much as before). But but I hate twice more Toyota (as company) for: a) not make it for 50% stronger/faster (with this price tag) -> make it 300HP/305Nm and I have no issue to pay 40k for it. b) not selling it for half here (with this power) -> give it price tag 23k (as to Scion in US) and I will say not a single word about power. End of story ![]() -------------------- No more replicas... This is evolution... This is SS-four :)
![]() ________[Featured Celica of 6gc.net @ 2010]_________ |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jun 29, '08 From Denver Currently Offline Reputation: 59 (100%) ![]() |
Did someone say boobs?
![]() This post has been edited by richee3: Oct 3, 2012 - 4:41 PM -------------------- "Employ your time in improving yourself by other men's writings, so that you shall gain easily what others labored hard for." -Socrates. Even Socrates told us to use the search button!
![]() 2006 Aston Martin V8 Vantage. 1998 Celica GT- BEAMS Swapped. 2022 4Runner TRD Off Road Prenium. 2021 GMC Sierra AT4. |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 17th, 2025 - 12:14 AM |