Back Pressure in NA, Is it really needed? |
Back Pressure in NA, Is it really needed? |
Apr 18, 2004 - 8:11 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 24, '03 From Milton, Delaware Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Ok, i know everyone says that Back Pressure is needed in NA engines but i need to know whether this is true.
Article If back pressure is actually REQUIRED, then why do you see dragsters w/ nothing but straight pipes coming directly off the engine? Isnt it more likely that a car simply loses power because its not tuned correctly? Granted there is going to be some back pressure caused by expanding gasses in teh dragsters exhaust, but minimal say compared to mufflers and such. I have read in several places that new cams and such will solve problems associated w/ loss of backpressure, and basically cars just arent stock set up to run w/ much less back pressure. So say you're allowed to do anything you want to an engine, besides overbore w/e, or FI, is almost no backpressure really bad? Say you had an exhaust like this.... CLICK but minus the turbo of the wrx? IONO maybe i'm rambling cuz i was just arguing w/ my friend about this.... -Ryan -------------------- AIM : FAQdaWorld
|
Apr 18, 2004 - 9:04 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 19, '04 From austin tx Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
backpressure is bad in any car. what you want is your exhaust gas to be high velocity. when you make the exhaust too big it slows the gas down. many people will tell you to think of it like a straw... if its too small you just cant get anything through, if its too big its too slow... and that exhaust, i would think with the split in it, it would cause turbulence in the system, not postive, but thats my opinion..
anyways, backpressure = bad, high velocity = good -------------------- |
Apr 19, 2004 - 12:54 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 30, '02 From Maryland Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
Back pressure is fine in a n/a car. Its not going to help you out putting a straight exhaust in a n/a. With a turbo car backpressure can make the turbo spool less quickly. Gutting your cats or having a larger ehaust will allow the turbo to work at a faster pace.
Back pressuer in n/a = ok..(Not good but also you dont want to get rid of it) Back pressure in boosted car = faster spooling turbo. -------------------- Member of Team 5sfTe
|
Apr 19, 2004 - 1:00 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 26, '03 From McKenzie, TN Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
*Back pressure in boosted car = slower spooling.
|
Apr 19, 2004 - 2:22 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 24, '03 From Milton, Delaware Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
right, i understand this w/ the backpressure in turbo's and such. Can a NA car be tuned to run w/ less back pressure? Basically this whole argument started between and my friend because he showed me that link for the thing on the subaru and i said, thats not really anything new besides being electronic, they put that on older muscle cars and stuff too, only it was mechanical and not electrical.
-Ryan -Ryan -------------------- AIM : FAQdaWorld
|
Apr 19, 2004 - 7:04 PM |
|
||||
Enthusiast Joined Aug 29, '02 From Dallas, Tx Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
No no no no no.
Exactly right. This guy knows his stuff. There is NOTHING NOTHING NOTHING good about back pressure unless you have cams that have a rediculous amount of overlap (we don't; think early '70s muscle cars). To make a really long fluid dynamics discussion really short: Backpressure (resistance to flow) = Bad (always) Exhaust gas velocity = must be in useful range (i.e. pipe not too small, not too big)(generally around 2.25"-2.75" post collector tube diameter for a 1.8l 4cyl) Turbo cars are less picky about velocity, you can run a rediculously large exhaust (to aid quick spooling) and not really suffer any ill consequences. |
||||
Apr 20, 2004 - 10:52 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 24, '03 From Milton, Delaware Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Ok spedtoe, u seem to know ur stuff.Let me phrase it like this now... say we take any engine u want, remove all the exhaust including the headers, and then properly tune the engine however it needs to be tuned, will the engine yield less hp / tq with the headers / exhaust on it?
-------------------- AIM : FAQdaWorld
|
Apr 20, 2004 - 12:51 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 30, '02 From Maryland Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
You mean you want it to fire straight out of the head?
-------------------- Member of Team 5sfTe
|
Apr 20, 2004 - 1:11 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 24, '03 From Milton, Delaware Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
No, i dont want to. I'm just saying for arguments sake, but yea sure right out the head.
-------------------- AIM : FAQdaWorld
|
Apr 20, 2004 - 5:39 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 29, '02 From Dallas, Tx Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
It would run like crap because it has no exhaust gas inerita to scavenge the cylinders(I never said a short exhaust was necessarily good, just that it should have as little backpressure as possible). Think of the moving exhaust as a continuous column. If that column is moving it has inertia. If there is something slowing down or blocking the front of the column, then the molecules directly behind the front will slam into the ones in front of them and so on down the line. Ovbiously this will slow things down, eventually it will slow things down at the beginning of the exhaust (in the head and the cylinder)(think of a traffic jam....you're stuck in traffic before you get to the accident). Any obstruction to the flow of the exhaust will slow it down and reduce its inertia. It relies on inertia (scavenging) to help pull the exhaust out of the cylinder each time the exhaust valve open. If an engine has no exhaust outside the head, then the velocity will slow rapidly (theoretically to 0) as soon as it exits the head. There will be no moving column of air, so there will be no inertia, so there will be no scavenging. The engine will still run because the exhaust gas in the cylinder will be above atmospheric pressure, but it will not make very good power at all because there is no scavenging.
There are however, exceptions. Top Fuel dragsters are the most notable. They have very short exhausts coming out of each individual cylinder and they make very good power. How you ask? They are supercharged. The intake air is pressurized to way above atmospheric pressure so the exhaust gas is also way above atmospheric. At first glance this would seem no different from the standard car except that there is a higher pressure gradient, but there is one other trick up the top fuelers sleve.....They run cams with large overlap. The intake valve and the exhaust valve are both open together for a split second during the exhaust stroke. This means that the positive pressure from the supercharger can 'blow' the exhaust out of the cylinders and scavenging is not necessary. The caveat to this is that they also blow a HUGE amount of unburned fuel and air out of the exhaust headers along with the exhaust. Its terribly inefficient but produces gobs of power. It also creates beautiful blue flames at night when the hot exhaust valve ignites the unburned fuel as it leaves the engine. This might also work with turbo cars but not nearly as well and only at full throttle and on boost. The overlap in the cams would cause the engine to run really bad off boost and probably make it really laggy. It would likely also eat up the bearings in the turbo and possibly the turbine wheel from the raw unburned fuel (which would end up burning in the exhaust). In short, its a fun discussion but its not practical for anything we'll likely ever do. If you're really serious about power there is a LOT you can do with tuning the length of the exhaust and the placement and type of collector. Unfortunately this is very expensive and very time consuming (lots and lots of dyno time). We've done a lot of this with our race cars (read; hundreds of hours on the dyno) and found good gains, but theres still more to be had. |
Apr 20, 2004 - 10:09 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 24, '03 From Milton, Delaware Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
spedtoe == l337, j/k mang, u rock. Thanks for the excellent explanation.
-------------------- AIM : FAQdaWorld
|
Apr 21, 2004 - 9:09 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 29, '02 From Dallas, Tx Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Anytime! I've actually been having this discussion with people for years now and I've done a lot of research to come up with the stuff I have. I've actually thought about writing a book a few years down the road. There aren't a lot of good books about exhaust tuning.
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 24th, 2024 - 3:53 AM |