The Gen 7, like it? dislike it? ....your views |
The Gen 7, like it? dislike it? ....your views |
Mar 2, 2003 - 10:37 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 17, '02 From UK Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
This topic might have been discussed before when the gen 7 first came out, but I ain't seen it so here goes.
I thinks it's ok, it's a Toyota after all so it's not going to be bad. Its reliable and solid like all Toyotas and has got decent performance. But.... I really couldn't live with the car's styling. Too angular for my taste, a bit too sci-fi inspired. The back espescially doesn't look too great. I like my cars curvy like the gen 6. I have to say that I am getting used to the styling now it's been around for a while but can't say if I'd ever buy one. IMO This post has been edited by Tony-94: Mar 3, 2003 - 5:12 PM -------------------- Facelift bumper-foglights-clear indicators, clear side repeaters, 16in O.Z alloys, stainless steel grill. JDM facelift tail lights. clear sidelights. Retro-fit A/C conversion. APEX performance springs. Remus exhaust. K&N performance filter. KYB excel G shocks.
Hyundai coupe Mk 3 (US Tiburon) leather seats. Gen 7 s/wheel. SR black vinyl door cards. Late spec spoiler-less tailgate with 3rd brake light. |
Mar 2, 2003 - 11:49 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 12, '02 From Baltimore, MD Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
I agree, too angular for my taste, but if you do the right thing (such as selling it and buying a 6th gen) then its all good
-------------------- |
Mar 2, 2003 - 12:08 PM |
|
|
ya me too.
I would definitely get a 7th gen if you could drop a 3S-GTE in there and make it AWD. hehehe Because aren't they lighter? |
Mar 2, 2003 - 12:15 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 21, '02 From Toronto, Canada Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
In performance. 7th gen is better. GT is good for fuel economy, GTS for good performance. For the exterior, 7th gen has an edgier look, but it is ugly. The butt sits too high, and looks like a ship. A lot of ppl are split over 7th gen's looks, but almost all agree that 6th is the best looking. For interior, it is not as nice as 6th gen, it has more "plastic" look. The windows are so small, it is hard to see blind spots. The front seats are nice tho, but there's practically no room in the rear. 7th gen is quite a nice car, I don't think I will buy one if a need a new car.
|
Mar 2, 2003 - 2:33 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 9, '02 From San Diego, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I love how they look, only thing I don't like is they don't seem as well built as the 6th gen celica, seems like people are having little problems with them here and there already.
|
Mar 2, 2003 - 4:03 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 3, '02 From Diego Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
only thing that comes to mind is newer car meaning less to no milage. But the fact that they dont have a celica gt-four (instead isnt it celica SS or whatever...), the newer 1's dosent mean much in Japan. America however...since this country sux when it comes to importing cars (reason's why ppl have civics an not sumthin way better like a 95 300zx, etc.), the newer celica gt-s is all we have. Our gen in america comes stock with crappy motors...
|
Mar 2, 2003 - 7:12 PM |
|
||
Enthusiast Joined Dec 17, '02 From UK Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Thats the impression I get. I think because the gen 7 is priced a lot cheaper than the gen 6 when it was new they had to sacrifice on build quality a little. -------------------- Facelift bumper-foglights-clear indicators, clear side repeaters, 16in O.Z alloys, stainless steel grill. JDM facelift tail lights. clear sidelights. Retro-fit A/C conversion. APEX performance springs. Remus exhaust. K&N performance filter. KYB excel G shocks.
Hyundai coupe Mk 3 (US Tiburon) leather seats. Gen 7 s/wheel. SR black vinyl door cards. Late spec spoiler-less tailgate with 3rd brake light. |
||
Mar 2, 2003 - 10:45 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 11, '02 From Ohio Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Well even though I kinda perfer the 6 gen...I was at the cleveland auto show today and they had one of the 7 gen with the "action" package and I couldn't stop staring at it. Granted it did have a body kit, so to say, maybe i would look at a 6 gen just has hard with a body kit. But I think the 7 gen looks sweet too.
|
Mar 2, 2003 - 10:57 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 22, '02 From South Sioux City Nebraska Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I like the way they look, i didnt at first, but they grew on me, i now think they look badass(still not as good as the 6th ) but better than all the civics and integras out there.
|
Mar 2, 2003 - 11:24 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 26, '02 From Alabama Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
i didn't like them in the beginning either. Now though, I would take one. You can drop a supercharger in and get 200HP at the wheels. (that's on a 2300 pound car!)
|
Mar 2, 2003 - 11:39 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 3, '02 From bonzaisushi@hotmail.com Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
ya a super charger for 4500? jsut doesnt seem worth it to me, i love the car however, i test drove a gts before i got my celica sweet car, but no power till 5500, just seems wierd but its is a high revvin mother. it handles good too, but then i test drove teh 96gt and i fell in luv, 3k cheaper looked better, seemd more powerful, (TO me). but id take a gts nuttin like revvin a car to 8300
|
Mar 3, 2003 - 1:22 AM |
|
||
Enthusiast Joined Nov 29, '02 From Oregon Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
yeah I didn't like them at all at first, but I like em pretty well now. Still thinks curves are much better than angles on cars (6th gen celica's better lookin than 7th gen celica's). With bodykit's they look a lot better too. My friend's gonna get one pretty soon, and I'm gettin ready to get beat on the race track lol. |
||
Mar 3, 2003 - 1:45 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Sep 5, '02 From Phoenix, AZ Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I think the 7gc is crap. Too boxy lookin and with 3 different chassis types, not 1 of them has a turbo stock. The interior reminds me of a 2000+ Cougar. Waste of money in my eyes.
|
Mar 3, 2003 - 1:56 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 3, '02 From bonzaisushi@hotmail.com Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
they have 180, but not till 7600(right?) like i said there fun cars to drive, but the speed is not there till 5.5k
|
Mar 3, 2003 - 4:34 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 8, '02 From Narragansett,RI Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
My bro has a 2000 Celli GT. I keep telling him that his car is ugly and he tells me the same about my car. I just think that theres too many angles in the car. I like curves like what we have in our cars. But I have to say that I've always wished that there was as many parts out there for our car as there is for the 7th gen.
|
Mar 3, 2003 - 5:03 PM |
|
||
Enthusiast Joined Dec 17, '02 From UK Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Something like that. Because of the variable valve timing (vvti) engines they need to be revved very high and kept at the high revs through the gears to use the power effectively. -------------------- Facelift bumper-foglights-clear indicators, clear side repeaters, 16in O.Z alloys, stainless steel grill. JDM facelift tail lights. clear sidelights. Retro-fit A/C conversion. APEX performance springs. Remus exhaust. K&N performance filter. KYB excel G shocks.
Hyundai coupe Mk 3 (US Tiburon) leather seats. Gen 7 s/wheel. SR black vinyl door cards. Late spec spoiler-less tailgate with 3rd brake light. |
||
Mar 3, 2003 - 5:19 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 1, '02 From PA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I like them
|
Mar 3, 2003 - 6:21 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 30, '02 From Michigan Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
the looks is all opinion, i like edgy and retro, but i also love the slow smooth curves (like the 6gc). given the choice id probably go with a 6gc over a 7gc, but i def. would take a 7th over quite a few other new cars on the market.
-------------------- Believer, you'll leave her, in leaving them all No but I don't buy it Like anything you do, as anyone you are Cause I'm... Ten Speed, of God's Blood & Burial |
Mar 3, 2003 - 11:44 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 26, '02 From Alabama Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
The GTS has most likely around.... 150-160 Wheel HP. The SC brings it up to 200whp. That's not bad. And yes, 4500 is too much to pay for a SC. BUT, it's far less than it would cost to 3s my car and add a stick. And I bet the 7th gen would be faster.
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 28th, 2024 - 8:26 AM |