6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Removing EGR system on 5sfe, sorry if its a repost.. redirect if is
post Sep 9, 2004 - 7:29 AM
+Quote Post
Supersprynt



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Feb 10, '03
From Connecticut
Currently Offline

Reputation: 11 (100%)




QUOTE (NEVERSTOP @ Sep 9, 2004 - 1:36 AM)
Some say that doing this will lower the intake temp by not using exhaust gases.. others say it will raise combustion temp by the lack of spent carbon in the combustion chamber

personally I think it would allow a little more a/f mix into the chamber... and well... "my daddy always told me it took gas to go fast" biggrin.gif biggrin.gif

really dont think it would make a difference though HP/performance wise that would be noticable.. do think it would provide a cleaner running engine longer as there would be less build up in the Intake side of things.. but a Oil catch can would do that also for me.. which I have one...would just need to figure out what exactly is tripping up the CEL...

You really wont notice any gains and you may see a little more smoke out the tail end, it definately wont run cleaner.

Also, it has no bearing on intake temps because it doesnt reach the intake, it goes through the combustion chamber and lowers combustion chamber temps because its colder exhaust gas recirculating, thats why it reduces detonation.


--------------------
post Sep 9, 2004 - 7:37 AM
+Quote Post
macavely



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Nov 4, '02
From Hecho en la Republica Dominicana/Living in NJ
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




i would like to know who had done this ON ther Celica ?


--------------------
post Sep 9, 2004 - 12:54 PM
+Quote Post
NEVERSTOP

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Nov 4, '02
From Davenport Iowa
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




well I think for right now im just gonna try and figure out what is causing the CEL and fix it.. really dont wanna spend money on something I think is a pointless function.. at least for me - No emmision checks wink.gif

But I can't seem to find any answers for this.. its almost 50/50 as for people suggesting it and discourageing it.. maybe not on this board but on other fourms.. who knows..will drop it when I get around to puttin my 3s in there for sure but for the 5sfte will prolly just leave it alone tongue.gif


--------------------

99 project version 3.0.. hello SEMA 2010 =)
post Sep 9, 2004 - 3:29 PM
+Quote Post
Kwanza26



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Dec 27, '03
From Nor Cal
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




For my final word...

I'll confirm what I've said before... and backup your info NEVERSTOP about the EGR function. Removing it will not solve your CEL problem, in fact, it will actually make it permanent. There isn't a real way (at least an easy one, short of litterally hacking the ECU) to remove the EGR and trick the ECU into not monitoring it... so you'll always have a CEL. My cousin has a similar thing with a CAT-less DC header on his 02 Civic SI, and he gets a CEL every now and then (but we can clear it cause we have the tools...) Anyways... as for pros and cons... the pro isn't huge, but the con isn't huge either. The EGR does have the side effect of reducing detonation cause it helps cool the combustion chamber, but it also does add a slight performance decrease because it spits back unclean induction... but give an take. As I said before... it's not a matter or removing it that's hard, but removing it is not gonna solve your CEL problem.


--------------------
"It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"

1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver...

1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies...

1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be...
post Sep 9, 2004 - 5:16 PM
+Quote Post
Snarfer

Enthusiast
*
Joined Dec 2, '03
From Virginia
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Most of the cons created by the egr are reduced or negated from the ecm controlling timing and injector behavior during high egr operations. removing it would reduce nastry crap inside of the intake manifold, but the ecm won't like that. I'm not sure if the ecm will still change the timing if it knows that the egr is not working, but that is the probable cause of the extra detonation. The egr is an INTEGRAL part of the engine operation under a stock ecm and removing would not be a good idea.

toyota egr white paper

This post has been edited by Snarfer: Sep 9, 2004 - 5:22 PM
post Sep 9, 2004 - 10:00 PM
+Quote Post
NEVERSTOP

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Nov 4, '02
From Davenport Iowa
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




jeez snarfer.. your all about the EGR tongue.gif

I will prolly leave it on for now... but still think on my perticualar setup it would prove benifical.

my ECU/ECM is gonna be all screwed up on timing here in a few weeks newayz with the 5sfte.. that is the reason for the MSD 6BTM and think with the larger injectors/fuel pump/FMU I would run a low chance of detoniation.

as for the EGR being an INTEGRAL part of the motor... it is only that way because of how the ECU is programed... example: JDM/EUROPEAN spec verisoins of the 5sfe with out the EGR system.

think if you swapped out the ECU/ECM to a JDM spec one the motor would run perfectly fine with the addition of less sludge... which is accually quite a bit.. read on MR2OC.net about a guy the ran a catch tank and picked up 30cc's in a month and a half! thats alot over the course of 10-15 years.

I think that if you reset the ECU to read the emission controls at 0 across the board it would also not trip a CEL.. Have a family friend that is the head tech up at Lujacks... one of the largest automalls in the country - he remaps ECU's all the time will prolly talk to him this weekend and see what he has to say about EGR removal.

but I do thank all of you for your imput on this matter... just wish something like this was a little more straight forward on the PRO/CON side of things.. kinda like an intake is wink.gif


--------------------

99 project version 3.0.. hello SEMA 2010 =)
post Aug 28, 2011 - 11:04 AM
+Quote Post
Detatch

Enthusiast
*
Joined Sep 28, '09
From Washington, MO
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (recneps @ Sep 8, 2004 - 10:26 PM) *
im pretty sure i remember something about jdm having a internal egr.

also can someone confirm that jdm emissions are a lot stricter than they are here.


CONFIRMATION: i spent 18 months in japan, their emissions are VERY strict. more so than anywhere i've been in the united states. that's why we're able to get a lot of jdm parts from over there, lol... they're not allowed to run some engines because of emissions... i only saw 2 GT-Four's when i was there, and both were owned by american military. shortly after they were released, emissions tightened... i think the few that are still in operation over there were garaged and such since then and are now old enough to be driven legally, because both of the ones i saw were the early years of the gen6... i think one was 94, and the other dude said his was a 95 if memory serves...

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: February 19th, 2025 - 9:48 PM