6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Takeing out the Catalatic converter, What kind of gains?
post Sep 14, 2004 - 2:19 PM
+Quote Post
shid



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 8, '04
From LA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (kevstir @ Sep 14, 2004 - 5:53 PM)
Made a huge diference to my car , the low down torque it gave made the car so much better driving around town, as raz sayed over here in the Uk everyone who has removed theres noticed a marked improvment, mind u the 3s-ge doesnt have a lot of low down torgue so any improvement will be felt better that with the engines u guys have

But taking out the cat would actually lose you low end torque. Your doing nothing to increase gas scavenging, just increasing exhaust flow. So, all in all, you should have lost low end torque.
post Sep 14, 2004 - 2:21 PM
+Quote Post
Guest_DJMC_Celica_*











Well the shop guy just called me, and said its nearly impossible to put a dual exhaust on, and he said i would have to weld something through the suspension, and he said you might loose torque, so i guess he is going to put somthing in my Cat conv. widen the inside, and then take the resonator out and run a straight pipe, and then put a muffler on!

What do you guys think!?
post Sep 14, 2004 - 2:25 PM
+Quote Post
shid



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 8, '04
From LA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE
Well the shop guy just called me, and said its nearly impossible to put a dual exhaust on,


Didn't everyone tell u that?

QUOTE
and he said you might loose torque


and I KNOW we told u that one

QUOTE
so i guess he is going to put somthing in my Cat conv. widen the inside, and then take the resonator out and run a straight pipe, and then put a muffler on!


Sometimes taking the resonator out makes the car sound horrible, I know many people on here say that was a mistake. It sounds like he's going to gut your cat (your cat will now just be for looks; you won't pass emissions)

Make sure he's not runnign too big of piping
post Sep 14, 2004 - 2:30 PM
+Quote Post
Guest_DJMC_Celica_*











He's not, i allready asked him!
post Sep 14, 2004 - 2:32 PM
+Quote Post
Kwanza26



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Dec 27, '03
From Nor Cal
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (Supersprynt @ Sep 14, 2004 - 5:40 PM)
what about boosted?

On a boosted car is a different story because the exhaust velocity is much much higher than on an n/a and freeing up the exhaust can make some big gains.

As for legal issues... you can carb certify and legalize a custom turbo kit, but paperwork and $$$ will thwart most attempts. As for the smog issue, if the cat is good, and the car burns relatively good, then I would imagine the car can still pass smog even with a turbo kit... or swap (tail pipe emmissions at least).


--------------------
"It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"

1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver...

1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies...

1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be...
post Sep 14, 2004 - 2:35 PM
+Quote Post
shid



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 8, '04
From LA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (Kwanza26 @ Sep 14, 2004 - 7:32 PM)
QUOTE (Supersprynt @ Sep 14, 2004 - 5:40 PM)
what about boosted?

On a boosted car is a different story because the exhaust velocity is much much higher than on an n/a and freeing up the exhaust can make some big gains.

In fact, freeing up the exhaust can lead to almost your biggest gains (besides uping the boost) since your turbo only spools up as fast as your exhaust lets it. If your exhaust is constrained, the exhaust gasses will go slower, and so will your turbo. In the short run, this is good for spooling up your turbo the fastest, but in the long run, you'll reach a point where your turbo just can't turn fast enough because of the exhaust gases
post Sep 14, 2004 - 3:27 PM
+Quote Post
SlowCelica94



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Sep 28, '03
From Bloomington, IN
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




I took my resinator out and regret it. Untill my car is plently warm, I sound like King Ricer. And there are plently of topics about this, use the search.

As far as gains go, lil low end torque will go, a bit up up hi will flow better. You pick ur pick if u want ur power up hi or down low. (I went up hi, we lack in hi rpms, but hold up well down low)


--------------------
NASA/SCCA RX-7....currently under the knife
92 Civic hatch B16 - Sold
10th anniv RX-7 - RIP
The Slow Celica - Sold...and then crushed crushed due to street racing.

Quote from Seinfeild: George's Boss reading a magazine: "People magazine's most beautiful people. Oh and a Celica...nothin wrong with that!"
post Sep 14, 2004 - 7:18 PM
+Quote Post
kevstir



Enthusiast
**
Joined Jul 5, '03
From Scotland , Uk
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (shid @ Sep 14, 2004 - 12:19 PM)
QUOTE (kevstir @ Sep 14, 2004 - 5:53 PM)
Made a huge diference to my car , the low down torque it gave made the car so much better driving around town, as raz sayed over here in the Uk everyone who has removed theres noticed a marked improvment, mind u the 3s-ge doesnt have a lot of low down torgue so any improvement will be felt better that with the engines u guys have

But taking out the cat would actually lose you low end torque. Your doing nothing to increase gas scavenging, just increasing exhaust flow. So, all in all, you should have lost low end torque.

Look m8 I only spend the time to write these posts if I know what I am talking about I am not in the habit of coming on here and telling lies.
It DID increase low end torque, what’s the point in me taking the time to say it helped my car when it didn’t?? it would make me a very bad member to promote something that doesn’t make any difference and have fellow members go out and buy a decat to find its a waste off money.
I am an avid Celica fan that like's to give good honest advice not some bumped up crap just to make myself look good, go ask the same question on www.celica-club.co.uk and see what the answers will be , I bet they all tell the same story as me .. I am only trying to help but every time I say something on this site I get flamed canny win.....


--------------------
post Sep 14, 2004 - 7:31 PM
+Quote Post
Anub1s



Enthusiast
***
Joined Nov 27, '03
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Its just the way shid is.....he likes to argue for no reason.
post Sep 14, 2004 - 9:42 PM
+Quote Post
shid



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 8, '04
From LA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (Anub1s @ Sep 15, 2004 - 12:31 AM)
Its just the way shid is.....he likes to argue for no reason.

...

Yeah, right.

Look, taking out the cat increasing exhaust flow while having the negative effect of decreasing gas scavenging pressure- which is directly related to low end torque. I don't give a **** what you think, thats general physics. Back it up with a dyno sheet.
post Sep 14, 2004 - 10:25 PM
+Quote Post
Jaws4God



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Mar 27, '04
Currently Offline

Reputation: 14 (100%)




so taking out the resonator makes it sound bad? will it pass inspection?


--------------------
~Daniel~ No Longer Celica Owner.. moved on to a 03 WRX-EJ207
post Sep 14, 2004 - 10:54 PM
+Quote Post
rjbibeau



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Sep 6, '04
From oakdale Mn
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




i took out the resonator out all that it does it muffles the backfire a bit when shifting. otherwise it sounds awesome without it it almost doubled it.


--------------------
user posted image
post Sep 14, 2004 - 10:56 PM
+Quote Post
rjbibeau



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Sep 6, '04
From oakdale Mn
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




just gut the primary cat out don't let these dudes tell you that it's worthless because it takes like a whole 15 minutes wow big deal hey why not do it?


--------------------
user posted image
post Sep 15, 2004 - 1:29 AM
+Quote Post
97sccelica



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 30, '02
From Anaheim, CA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (shid @ Sep 14, 2004 - 6:42 PM)
Look, taking out the cat increasing exhaust flow while having the negative effect of decreasing gas scavenging pressure- which is directly related to low end torque. I don't give a **** what you think, thats general physics. Back it up with a dyno sheet.

if its one of those cats that is built into the exhuast manifold, removing it will help the entire powerband.

if its the one that is located just behind the firewall, then you wont notice any gains, possibly some loss in the low end.

i'm speaking from experience, on my dad's 98 civic DX coupe, it had the kind of exhaust manifold with built in cat. one of the runners cracked, so we took it off and replaced it with a 4-2-1 header i bought off of ebay.

car got louder, and pulled harder through all the rpms

also, went from 32mpg to 34mpg(he drove 80 miles a day round trip to work)

since i took my cats out of my wrx, i have noticed slightly better mpg. not that i am technically getting more per tank, its just that i push the car a little harder and still get the same milage.

i gotta drive a good 150 miles tomorrow, i usually got 27-28mpg on the freeway, i'll see what i get tomorrow.


--------------------
1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram
post Sep 15, 2004 - 1:56 AM
+Quote Post
Kwanza26



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Dec 27, '03
From Nor Cal
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (97sccelica @ Sep 15, 2004 - 6:29 AM)
i'm speaking from experience, on my dad's 98 civic DX coupe, it had the kind of exhaust manifold with built in cat. one of the runners cracked, so we took it off and replaced it with a 4-2-1 header i bought off of ebay.

car got louder, and pulled harder through all the rpms

also, went from 32mpg to 34mpg(he drove 80 miles a day round trip to work)

since i took my cats out of my wrx, i have noticed slightly better mpg. not that i am technically getting more per tank, its just that i push the car a little harder and still get the same milage.

That's completely different though... Removing the pre-cat in the header is not "removing the cat" like say under the car, which this topic reffers to. Even if you remove the cat from the exhaust manifold, the manifold still will not make gains because of the size of the space where the cat used to be. Exhaust manifolds in n/a trim are pretty picky about flow and velocity when it comes to actually making some power. That's why a header is needed... and of course, a header will make some positive gains in most cars.

As for your WRX... its mix in this discussion is not accurate mostly because being Turbo charged... it will see gains from exhaust flow modifications while n/a motors usually do not always see gains...


--------------------
"It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"

1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver...

1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies...

1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be...
post Sep 15, 2004 - 2:47 AM
+Quote Post
Uppitycracker



Enthusiast
****
Joined Jul 12, '03
From Chatham, Ont
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Removing the cat is environmentally irresponsible... tongue.gif at least thats just me view on it


And you people really need a lesson in the power of suggestion, if you do something you think is going to make your car faster, then you'll probably believe it does regardless of whether it made a difference or not.

So while you take out thge cat, put some 3" pipes on your stock engine, and cut some holes in a few vaccum hoses, should take away plenty of horse power, but I swear it'll feel like you added 50hp!!!!!! rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by Uppitycracker: Sep 15, 2004 - 2:54 AM
post Sep 15, 2004 - 8:58 AM
+Quote Post
Guest_DJMC_Celica_*











hahahaha, well im pretty sure im not going to lose anything, the guy dyno'd it before, and he is going to dyno it after just to make sure nothing was lost!
post Sep 15, 2004 - 10:54 AM
+Quote Post
97sccelica



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 30, '02
From Anaheim, CA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (Kwanza26 @ Sep 14, 2004 - 10:56 PM)
QUOTE (97sccelica @ Sep 15, 2004 - 6:29 AM)
i'm speaking from experience, on my dad's 98 civic DX coupe, it had the kind of exhaust manifold with built in cat.  one of the runners cracked, so we took it off and replaced it with a 4-2-1 header i bought off of ebay.

car got louder, and pulled harder through all the rpms

also, went from 32mpg to 34mpg(he drove 80 miles a day round trip to work)

since i took my cats out of my wrx, i have noticed slightly better mpg.  not that i am technically getting more per tank, its just that i push the car a little harder and still get the same milage.

That's completely different though... Removing the pre-cat in the header is not "removing the cat" like say under the car, which this topic reffers to. Even if you remove the cat from the exhaust manifold, the manifold still will not make gains because of the size of the space where the cat used to be. Exhaust manifolds in n/a trim are pretty picky about flow and velocity when it comes to actually making some power. That's why a header is needed... and of course, a header will make some positive gains in most cars.

As for your WRX... its mix in this discussion is not accurate mostly because being Turbo charged... it will see gains from exhaust flow modifications while n/a motors usually do not always see gains...

i get what youre saying, had i gutted the cat in the manifold, the car wouldnt have had a noticable change

but i am pretty sure that was the only cat on my dad's car, in fact, it was, and the dealer wanted like $900 for it.


--------------------
1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram
post Sep 15, 2004 - 11:08 AM
+Quote Post
rjbibeau



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Sep 6, '04
From oakdale Mn
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




when we refer to cat we're of course talking about the primary cat


--------------------
user posted image
post Sep 16, 2004 - 6:47 PM
+Quote Post
Kwanza26



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Dec 27, '03
From Nor Cal
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (97sccelica @ Sep 15, 2004 - 3:54 PM)
i get what youre saying, had i gutted the cat in the manifold, the car wouldnt have had a noticable change

but i am pretty sure that was the only cat on my dad's car, in fact, it was, and the dealer wanted like $900 for it.

Yea... I believe the older D15/16 Civics have only one cat in the manifold...


--------------------
"It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"

1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver...

1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies...

1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be...

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: February 17th, 2025 - 12:22 PM