6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Big Brother, Under the hood
post Nov 21, 2004 - 2:48 AM
+Quote Post
mr_dude



Enthusiast
***
Joined Feb 16, '04
From San Diego
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Recently /.ed article. Black boxes in new cars huh? Sounds worse than the anti-crime cameras they put all over Oceania... I mean the UK.

http://www.cars.com/news/stories/111604_storyb_an.jhtml



--------------------
user posted image
post Nov 21, 2004 - 2:54 AM
+Quote Post
Uppitycracker



Enthusiast
****
Joined Jul 12, '03
From Chatham, Ont
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Hey man why should you be worried about public cameras if your not commiting a crime? I mean you have no privacy in when you in public anyways...and it reduces crime quite a bit...I don't see a valid arguement against them....
post Nov 21, 2004 - 3:04 AM
+Quote Post
mr_dude



Enthusiast
***
Joined Feb 16, '04
From San Diego
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




1. The oft-used slippery-slope argument.
2. F ups in the system. (Hence the 1984 reference).
3. Corporations getting ahold of such information (insurance companies, etc.).

Like having a black box in your car. I'm sure it reduces speeding quite a bit, but if your auto insurance company knows that you have a tendency to brake hard, finding a cheap rate could be difficult.


--------------------
user posted image
post Nov 21, 2004 - 4:03 AM
+Quote Post
Uppitycracker



Enthusiast
****
Joined Jul 12, '03
From Chatham, Ont
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE(mr_dude @ Nov 21, 2004 - 1:04 AM)
1.  The oft-used slippery-slope argument.
2.  F ups in the system.  (Hence the 1984 reference).
3.  Corporations getting ahold of such information (insurance companies, etc.).

Like having a black box in your car.  I'm sure it reduces speeding quite a bit, but if your auto insurance company knows that you have a tendency to brake hard, finding a cheap rate could be difficult.
[right][snapback]209704[/snapback][/right]

I can understand the argument against the auto one, but not really the public camera, though the arguments against both are one in the same, protecting your right to break the law wink.gif
post Nov 21, 2004 - 7:53 PM
+Quote Post
carb0n_f1b3r



Enthusiast
*
Joined Sep 23, '04
From Stillwater, Ok
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




[QUOTE]Uppitycracker Posted Yesterday, 07:54 AM
Hey man why should you be worried about public cameras if your not commiting a crime? I mean you have no privacy in when you in public anyways...and it reduces crime quite a bit...I don't see a valid arguement against them....
[QUOTE]

exactly thats why we should indoctrinate everyone with socialist propaganda to route out the dam dirty thought criminals.... SLAVERY IS FREEDOM, I LOVE BIG BROTHER bowdown.gif bowdown.gif bowdown.gif

This post has been edited by carb0n_f1b3r: Nov 21, 2004 - 7:57 PM


--------------------
WAR HAS NEVER SOLVED ANYTHING...EXCEPT FOR THE ENDING OF COMMUNISM, FASCISM, NAZISM, AND SLAVERY.
post Nov 21, 2004 - 8:38 PM
+Quote Post
Coomer



Administrator
*****
Joined Aug 23, '02
From Seattle, WA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 14 (100%)




Man, that article is scary. frown.gif


--------------------
New Toyota project coming soon...

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: November 27th, 2024 - 9:42 PM