Rims size, change in performance |
Rims size, change in performance |
Mar 7, 2005 - 6:59 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 14, '04 Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
hey guys, I was just wondering, how much difference would you feel between using stock 15 inch rims and 17 inch rims (not chrome or lightweight performance) such as the adr gt sports? Anybody who switched from stocks to 17 inchers, please tell me what difference you felt (how much slower). Also, anybody with track experience, what is the difference in quarter mile from stock 15 inchers and 17 inchers? Anybody with input please........uh.. input? haha! yeah, well thanks! (sorry if this is stupid question)
|
Mar 7, 2005 - 7:07 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 17, '04 From Illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
If you keep the outside diameter of the tires the same, there is no difference in gearing or speed. The biggest difference in larger wheels is that the smaller sidewalls on the tires make the feel stiffer which is great for the corners but does give a little bit more bumpy ride on marginal roads.
P.S. Its not a stupid question. -------------------- QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback] i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this. |
Mar 7, 2005 - 7:12 PM |
|
Administrator Joined Aug 23, '02 From Seattle, WA Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
There is actually a difference in speed, since some rims are lighter than others. That's why people often spend large amounts of money for lightweight rims for their cars.
-------------------- New Toyota project coming soon...
|
Mar 7, 2005 - 7:35 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 17, '04 From Illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
True but he didn't mention weight - only size.
-------------------- QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback] i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this. |
Mar 7, 2005 - 8:46 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 14, '04 Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
oh, I see. The reason I asked was because I want to raise( yes I said raise haha!) my car a bit since it is lowered 1.75 inches in the front and 1.5 in the back. Where I live,
It is not fun driving a lowered car anymore. The problem is that I want to raise my car, but not have an ugly gap. If I get bigger rims, I'm concerned of my performance, cuz I'm just happy the way it is it right now. |
Mar 8, 2005 - 2:34 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 19, '04 From Los Angeles, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
Actually, acording to physics and the laws of enersa, if you have 2 wheels, both th exact same weight, and accelerate them, the wheel with the majority of its mass located at the center will accellerate faster. This is because the weight is at the center and is easier to start to move. So, you will have higher speeds with lighter tires, but also with smaller tires, even if they were the same weight.
I just got the Mortegi rx5s, which are 17inch, 19lbs rims, about 6 ponds lighter than stock (i believe) and i think that i notice a bit more speed. |
Mar 8, 2005 - 2:54 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 17, '04 From Illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Cheesy, your science is correct but the "more speed" is likely in your head. The "theory" we are talking about here translates to negligable effects in a low powered, street driven car. The weight game is played by serious draggers who are looking for a few tenths or even a few hundredths at the track. Do you really think that losing 24 lbs off your a stock ST is going to make it run noticably faster? I think sometimes we get a part to mod our car and we want so much for the performance to be better that we fool ourselves.
I am sure the rims look good though P.S. its "inertia" -------------------- QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback] i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this. |
Mar 8, 2005 - 3:26 AM |
|
Administrator Joined Aug 23, '02 From Seattle, WA Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
QUOTE(jgreening @ Mar 7, 2005 - 11:54 PM) Cheesy, your science is correct but the "more speed" is likely in your head. The "theory" we are talking about here translates to negligable effects in a low powered, street driven car. The weight game is played by serious draggers who are looking for a few tenths or even a few hundredths at the track. Do you really think that losing 24 lbs off your a stock ST is going to make it run noticably faster? I think sometimes we get a part to mod our car and we want so much for the performance to be better that we fool ourselves. I am sure the rims look good though P.S. its "inertia" [right][snapback]254550[/snapback][/right] It's not just losing 24 lbs. though. It's losing 24 lbs. of rotating mass, which equates to bigger gains than removing 24 lbs. from the rest of the car. -------------------- New Toyota project coming soon...
|
Mar 8, 2005 - 3:31 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 17, '04 From Illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Coomer @ Mar 8, 2005 - 3:26 AM) QUOTE(jgreening @ Mar 7, 2005 - 11:54 PM) Cheesy, your science is correct but the "more speed" is likely in your head. The "theory" we are talking about here translates to negligable effects in a low powered, street driven car. The weight game is played by serious draggers who are looking for a few tenths or even a few hundredths at the track. Do you really think that losing 24 lbs off your a stock ST is going to make it run noticably faster? I think sometimes we get a part to mod our car and we want so much for the performance to be better that we fool ourselves. I am sure the rims look good though P.S. its "inertia" [right][snapback]254550[/snapback][/right] It's not just losing 24 lbs. though. It's losing 24 lbs. of rotating mass, which equates to bigger gains than removing 24 lbs. from the rest of the car. [right][snapback]254558[/snapback][/right] I understand. But its still a ST... Lets return from theory and enter the real world here. -------------------- QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback] i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this. |
Mar 8, 2005 - 12:10 PM |
|
Administrator Joined Aug 23, '02 From Seattle, WA Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
QUOTE(jgreening @ Mar 8, 2005 - 12:31 AM) QUOTE(Coomer @ Mar 8, 2005 - 3:26 AM) QUOTE(jgreening @ Mar 7, 2005 - 11:54 PM) Cheesy, your science is correct but the "more speed" is likely in your head. The "theory" we are talking about here translates to negligable effects in a low powered, street driven car. The weight game is played by serious draggers who are looking for a few tenths or even a few hundredths at the track. Do you really think that losing 24 lbs off your a stock ST is going to make it run noticably faster? I think sometimes we get a part to mod our car and we want so much for the performance to be better that we fool ourselves. I am sure the rims look good though P.S. its "inertia" [right][snapback]254550[/snapback][/right] It's not just losing 24 lbs. though. It's losing 24 lbs. of rotating mass, which equates to bigger gains than removing 24 lbs. from the rest of the car. [right][snapback]254558[/snapback][/right] I understand. But its still a ST... Lets return from theory and enter the real world here. [right][snapback]254559[/snapback][/right] Regardless of a car's power, removing 24 lbs. of rotating mass is a good thing that will result in quicker acceleration/braking. -------------------- New Toyota project coming soon...
|
Mar 8, 2005 - 12:28 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 17, '04 From Illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Coomer @ Mar 8, 2005 - 12:10 PM) QUOTE(jgreening @ Mar 8, 2005 - 12:31 AM) QUOTE(Coomer @ Mar 8, 2005 - 3:26 AM) QUOTE(jgreening @ Mar 7, 2005 - 11:54 PM) Cheesy, your science is correct but the "more speed" is likely in your head. The "theory" we are talking about here translates to negligable effects in a low powered, street driven car. The weight game is played by serious draggers who are looking for a few tenths or even a few hundredths at the track. Do you really think that losing 24 lbs off your a stock ST is going to make it run noticably faster? I think sometimes we get a part to mod our car and we want so much for the performance to be better that we fool ourselves. I am sure the rims look good though P.S. its "inertia" [right][snapback]254550[/snapback][/right] It's not just losing 24 lbs. though. It's losing 24 lbs. of rotating mass, which equates to bigger gains than removing 24 lbs. from the rest of the car. [right][snapback]254558[/snapback][/right] I understand. But its still a ST... Lets return from theory and enter the real world here. [right][snapback]254559[/snapback][/right] Regardless of a car's power, removing 24 lbs. of rotating mass is a good thing that will result in quicker acceleration/braking. [right][snapback]254613[/snapback][/right] You're right Coom. I don't mean to be argumentatitve but let me put this another way. Lets assume gnetik was interested in some Racing Hart CR's (I heard they look good ). Racing Hart makes both one piece regular weight CR's which you can get for about $1000 shipped and forged three piece light racing rims for about $2500 shipped. Assuming he had $2500 to spend on performance upgrades, would you recommend the three piece (minor cosmetic differences aside) or would you recommend the one piece and putting the other $1500 into other performance modifications (e.g. turbo)? My point here is that everything needs to be kept in context and an owner of an ST that isn't going to be HEAVILY modded with a price-is-no-object mentality should not be encouraged to spend money on light racing rims for "performance" reasons. I am curious if you agree. Jay This post has been edited by jgreening: Mar 8, 2005 - 10:02 PM -------------------- QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback] i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this. |
Mar 8, 2005 - 12:34 PM |
|
Administrator Joined Aug 23, '02 From Seattle, WA Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
Well yeah, I wouldn't drop $2,500 on those wheels. But they do make cheap, light wheels, like Rotas.
-------------------- New Toyota project coming soon...
|
Mar 8, 2005 - 8:46 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 16, '04 From UK Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Removing rotational mass is a very very very good thing indeed. Removing unsprung mass is also a very very good thing indeed.
Light wheels are excellent, and well worth the money for a performance car. QUOTE(Coomer @ Mar 8, 2005 - 12:34 PM) Well yeah, I wouldn't drop $2,500 on those wheels. But they do make cheap, light wheels, like Rotas. [right][snapback]254621[/snapback][/right] I did. They didn't fit. -------------------- JDM ST205
Blitz Spec NUR Exhaust, somewhere over $1000 Needing another one 18000 miles later, bloody annoying. |
Mar 8, 2005 - 9:07 PM |
|
Administrator Joined Aug 23, '02 From Seattle, WA Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
Why didn't they fit on your car Mr. E?
-------------------- New Toyota project coming soon...
|
Mar 8, 2005 - 9:10 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 16, '03 From Bay area Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
remember coomer.. it had problems clearing the gt4 calipers
|
Mar 8, 2005 - 9:53 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 14, '04 Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Oh, I see, so what all you guys are sayin is that it takes less torque or twisting force to rotate lighter wheels which leads to better acceleration, but lightweight wheels just cost too much? Also, Cheesy, you said -"I just got the Mortegi rx5s, which are 17inch, 19lbs rims, about 6 pounds lighter than stock (i believe) and i think that i notice a bit more speed." - You meant motegi right? And they are 6 pounds lighter than stock(even though it's 17 inch?)? Can anyone confirm this?- would the 19 pound motegi rx5 17 inch count as a perfromance wheel?- Ohhhhh I like this, this is interesting.
|
Mar 8, 2005 - 11:06 PM |
|
Administrator Joined Aug 23, '02 From Seattle, WA Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
QUOTE(Hanyo @ Mar 8, 2005 - 6:10 PM) remember coomer.. it had problems clearing the gt4 calipers [right][snapback]254809[/snapback][/right] Oh yeah...I wish I had that problem. -------------------- New Toyota project coming soon...
|
Mar 8, 2005 - 11:33 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 16, '04 From UK Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Coomer @ Mar 8, 2005 - 11:06 PM) QUOTE(Hanyo @ Mar 8, 2005 - 6:10 PM) remember coomer.. it had problems clearing the gt4 calipers [right][snapback]254809[/snapback][/right] Oh yeah...I wish I had that problem. [right][snapback]254879[/snapback][/right] Heh. At the time I was rather annoyed. Tried a 10mm spacer, and no joy. -------------------- JDM ST205
Blitz Spec NUR Exhaust, somewhere over $1000 Needing another one 18000 miles later, bloody annoying. |
Mar 9, 2005 - 1:08 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 25, '02 From Pittsburgh/Clairton, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
well i dont know if motegi's are the best for things such as autocrossing because i dont recall anyone using them there.
19lbs is not too light, but it is a step in the right direction. there should be many more 15lb wheels out there now, and it's not always the diameter that matters, but also the width the stock wheel is a 7" try getting a 8" oh yea, although www.wheelmax.com has good prices and such, if you are raising your car due to road conditions you may want to ask around before you buy, or search google because i've read about certain wheels from there bending easily -------------------- |
Mar 9, 2005 - 4:09 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 27, '03 From Nor Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I don't know where you guys are getting your stock wheel weights from... but stock 15in alloys probably doesn't weigh more than 18 pounds a piece... and that's the very max. I'd bet they're only about 15-16 pounds.
Basically... if you're getting wheels over 17 inches... they're not gonna be performance lightweight wheels unless you're paying over 2g's for them... the cheapest may be some kosei k1s which can still weight as much as 17-18 pounds in 17 inches. If you want lightweight wheels... 7th gen GTS wheels are nice and light... that, or get some 5x114.3 camry hubs pressed onto your spindles and buy some Rotas. -------------------- "It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"
1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver... 1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies... 1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be... |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: January 12th, 2025 - 2:05 PM |