RWD Celica, Swapping Supra drivetrain into Celica |
RWD Celica, Swapping Supra drivetrain into Celica |
Mar 15, 2005 - 3:37 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 8, '04 From Durham, NC Currently Offline Reputation: 6 (100%) |
sounds fun, if you need any moral support, I'm about an hour away lol. I am not much with engine work but I can cheer you on..
-Rob -------------------- |
Mar 15, 2005 - 3:42 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 15, '02 From Vidor, TX Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
i say stop with the flaming ... at least till and if he fails... other wise sean this goes for you to if you dont have anything nice to say ... dont say anything at all... and the reason, i believe, he is refering to the ts 3s swap is for the amount of room that is in the engine bay... he gave measurements for how much smaller the celica engine bay is it kinda to give you an idea on how much space he has to work with... without cuting the firewall up... am i right?
-DMC |
Mar 15, 2005 - 4:29 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 9, '05 From Charlotte Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Dude, you don't get it do you? I don't give a rats ass about the TS Supra, because it has NOTHING to do with you attempting to put a RWD drivetrain on a celica. So I don't see why on earth you keep mentioning how your project is possible because of the TS Supra, they don't have anything to do with one another. a 3sgte powered supra isn't proof that you could jam the same thing into a much smaller celica. [right][snapback]257671[/snapback][/right] [/quote] You haven't read this thread yet have you? The TS Supra was the inspiration for the idea. I don't have a Supra, my car doesn't have RWD yet. If you take a Supra and a Celica and flip them over then you will see the they are a little similar such as they both have tunnels for the driveshaft and axles and without the gas tank on the Celica there's room for a differential. The Supra has a larger slope to acommidate the Getrag. Not to insult your intelligence but have you been under a RWD car? |
Mar 15, 2005 - 5:01 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 9, '05 From Charlotte Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
As I said before if anyone has a reason why this would not work such as suspension issues, etc. then I want to hear them. If someone wants to say it wont work because my car is not a Supra and the engine bay is to small then don't post. This is a technical thread and I know the engine is a tight fit so unless someone can give me measurements on the 3S pully to output and top to bottom so I can compare measurements then don't say anything about the 3S not fitting. If it will not give me a good reason why and some figures. I don't get my information from opinions but if a group can give me some fairly accurate numbers then it's ok. The measrements do not have to be exact but if the numbers are close cool. This isn't engine building anyone that has a 3S doesn't need to measure with a dial caliper. The car will not sieze up if the motor is sitting 3 inches from the radiator. Shid the only thing I can find that even relates to your post is hood clearance. Also the whole thing behind the TS Supra is that it proves the 3S can be mated to the Getrag 6, which is one of the best transmissions on the planet. If a Richmond or Tremac which cost more could handle the power that the Getrag can then I would look into them.
|
Mar 15, 2005 - 5:31 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 9, '05 From Charlotte Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Im done for today, but tomorrow i'll try to post most of the ST Chassis dimensions.
|
Mar 15, 2005 - 6:02 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Sep 30, '02 From Washington Spokane / Coeur D' Alene Idaho Currently Offline Reputation: 11 (100%) |
just a question if your running your axle down that tunnel where your exhaust is now where are you going to put your exhaust?
of coarse we all know you are going to cut the gas tank to fit your stuff bracing for the back but that goes along with all the custom work back there is it doable yeah but is it worth the money? or you can say you can just as easy buy a 90 all track or older celica that is already RWD So what are you going to be doing with this car? show , daily driver, track/drift? -------------------- yea your 3sgte is cool but ill stick to my 7agte
|
Mar 15, 2005 - 6:32 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Apr 22, '04 From illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
More than likely he'll go with a fuel cell. It's the smartest and better idea. He won't have to worry about cutting issue's. Correct Darksecret?
-------------------- The most important lesson I learned from Karate-Dô Kyôshan – “You can not be what you do not believe you are” |
Mar 15, 2005 - 7:00 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 3, '04 From pittsburgh Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
All i have to say is that you better drift that f#$ker if you make it work...a drifting celica would be the hottest thing next to the olsen twins pre drug abuse days
-------------------- Now SR powered |
Mar 15, 2005 - 7:34 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 22, '03 From NOVA Currently Offline Reputation: 16 (100%) |
yea i'm really jealous cause when i get most the work i'm doing now done and get the money my ST is goin RWD too great that your doin this so it will be documented b4 i get to it haha or atleast i hope to get to it
"you can just as easy buy a 90 all track or older celica that is already RWD" ^^DUUR all trac isn't RWD its AWD lol but thats not his point he wants UNIQUE/DIFFERENT/STAND OUT sock it to em |
Mar 15, 2005 - 8:29 PM |
|
Moderator Joined Apr 17, '03 From Rockland NY Currently Offline Reputation: 15 (100%) |
I would like to see this happen, don't let the haters bring you down.
I would think that the supra is wider in the rear, wouldnt you need a custom differential ? I thought I read that you were gonna have wishbone in the rear. If so, maybe you should look into a 205 rear suspension set up. Good luck DEF -------------------- I will return one day. |
Mar 15, 2005 - 9:19 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 9, '05 From Charlotte Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(spunky393 @ Mar 15, 2005 - 7:32 PM) More than likely he'll go with a fuel cell. It's the smartest and better idea. He won't have to worry about cutting issue's. Correct Darksecret? [right][snapback]257781[/snapback][/right] I know I said i'll be back tomorrow but I can't help myself, yes a fuel cell or the tank from a GT-Four is required (don't hold me to the GT-Four tank though). The ST204 tank sits in the area for the rear end. Fuel Cells are actually a really good option anyways due to the cost being so low on them. The only thing that will need to be cut is an area for the lines to run through the floorboard and possibly a bottom housing for the cell. |
Mar 15, 2005 - 9:25 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 9, '05 From Charlotte Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(defgeph @ Mar 15, 2005 - 9:29 PM) I would like to see this happen, don't let the haters bring you down. I would think that the supra is wider in the rear, wouldnt you need a custom differential ? I thought I read that you were gonna have wishbone in the rear. If so, maybe you should look into a 205 rear suspension set up. Good luck DEF [right][snapback]257803[/snapback][/right] It's possible to use that set up as long as the rear end has the clearance. If I use the ST205 rear it can clear some measurment problems but I haven't checked rear end options yet. I haven't got the measurements for the Supra axle housing yet but it shouldn'tbe much larger than the ST205 and the TRD diff. for the Supra has already proven to be very capable. |
Mar 15, 2005 - 9:54 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 9, '05 From Charlotte Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Alright I got off work and went straight to my garage lifted my car and checked the most important underside measurements, if everyone with a 6th Gen takes a measuring tape and check these same areas you will come close to these results, these might be an inch off but thats because I did this with all the parts still in the car, when I do strip it down I will measure in mm to be more accurate.
Engine Bay: Top to Bottom Front: 21" Top to Bottom Rear: 29" (I checked on the passenger side about 8" from the centerline) Width: 36" (This is from the smallest points I can find) Depth: 34" (This is from the radiator, not support to the firewall) Driveshaft Tunnel Height: 7" (If the shift cable shield is removed there is a smooth area where I believe to be the mount area for the center diff.) Driveshaft Tunnel Width: 6" Driveshaft Tunnel Length: 64" (This goes from the firewall to the rear end housing area, the transmission and the rear end will take some of this area) Rear End Width: 58" (From the backs of each rotor) Rear End Height: 12" (This is probably a couple of inches off due to the gas tank) If any one is wondering how I got the height measurements I used a level and went from the lowest chassis point on the car. On my car the actual lowest point is the cat. I know the 3S is a different motor the the 5S but I checked it and for the people thinking that the 3S wont fit the bay then they are wrong. I can turn a 5S and still have 5"-6" of clearance on either side at the shortest point. I didn't mention anywhere that I probably won't keep A/C. Around here it's not that important. |
Mar 15, 2005 - 10:01 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 9, '05 From Charlotte Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(nik @ Mar 15, 2005 - 7:02 PM) just a question if your running your axle down that tunnel where your exhaust is now where are you going to put your exhaust? of coarse we all know you are going to cut the gas tank to fit your stuff bracing for the back but that goes along with all the custom work back there is it doable yeah but is it worth the money? or you can say you can just as easy buy a 90 all track or older celica that is already RWD So what are you going to be doing with this car? show , daily driver, track/drift? [right][snapback]257766[/snapback][/right] Where does the exhaust run for the '90 All-Trac it has an "axle" running down the tunnel. Sorry about saying that, but the exhaust will have to be custom to let the driveshft run down the tunnel. Exhaust is expensive but an easy fix. The exhaust might be a low set and could possibly scrape but its not very hard to add skid plates to keep the car from bottoming out on the exhaust. People with bags do it a lot and I think it looks stupid but to save my $1000 exhaust any cheap insurance will help. |
Mar 16, 2005 - 12:32 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 27, '03 From Nor Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
So far, everyone has a pretty mundane opinion. You are approaching this from a logical standpoint, but I still must say, you gotta do more research regarding the differences between a FF chassis and an FR chassis. It's not a matter of "possibly" fitting the engine... it's a matter of getting it to work. For one, FF cars are not designed for a longitudinal set-up, so the firewall, steering, front frame/crossmembers/reinforcement, will either be in the way, or be completely useless. You just gotta work around it. You still haven't addressed the problems I mentioned. As for the rear suspension, there will be minor issues, but all shouldn't be too big. If you get an ST165/185/205 rear-end, it should be fine... but there will still be a fair amount of custom fabrication to get things to work. There are differences between the trunkpans of the FF celica and the AWD celica.
This is my last response here. To close, the only reason you're not getting pwned by me, is because you are looking at this from a more practical position... I really could care less what the dreamers out there wanna think, but from my standpoint, even I wouldn't think to chop up a car like this, and I build import performanc cars for a living. Not that it's not possible, but just not practical. Think of it this way... Honda tuning is the BIGGEST thing in the import scene in the United states... but how often to you read of or see radical RWD conversions? Out of the countless number of Honda tuners... only a handful have ever been done. You're standing on a stage all by yourself... so any opinion here, mine included, is really not worth your ears if you're really truely serious. Good luck... and again... prove me wrong... -------------------- "It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"
1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver... 1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies... 1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be... |
Mar 16, 2005 - 9:49 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 9, '05 From Charlotte Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Kwanza26 @ Mar 16, 2005 - 1:32 AM) So far, everyone has a pretty mundane opinion. You are approaching this from a logical standpoint, but I still must say, you gotta do more research regarding the differences between a FF chassis and an FR chassis. It's not a matter of "possibly" fitting the engine... it's a matter of getting it to work. For one, FF cars are not designed for a longitudinal set-up, so the firewall, steering, front frame/crossmembers/reinforcement, will either be in the way, or be completely useless. You just gotta work around it. You still haven't addressed the problems I mentioned. As for the rear suspension, there will be minor issues, but all shouldn't be too big. If you get an ST165/185/205 rear-end, it should be fine... but there will still be a fair amount of custom fabrication to get things to work. There are differences between the trunkpans of the FF celica and the AWD celica. This is my last response here. To close, the only reason you're not getting pwned by me, is because you are looking at this from a more practical position... I really could care less what the dreamers out there wanna think, but from my standpoint, even I wouldn't think to chop up a car like this, and I build import performanc cars for a living. Not that it's not possible, but just not practical. Think of it this way... Honda tuning is the BIGGEST thing in the import scene in the United states... but how often to you read of or see radical RWD conversions? Out of the countless number of Honda tuners... only a handful have ever been done. You're standing on a stage all by yourself... so any opinion here, mine included, is really not worth your ears if you're really truely serious. Good luck... and again... prove me wrong... [right][snapback]257892[/snapback][/right] Thanks for the input Kwanza. I know the differences between RWD and FWD chassis set-ups and under the Celica there will be the front crossmemeber, the rear crossmember, the steering rack, and the rear suspension that will have to be addressed, I was under the thing for 3 hours last night just looking for things that would be in the way. This isn't the first time someone has made a FWD into a RWD and this isn't the first for a Celica. It's possible and not as bad of a task as everyone thinks. It will require a lot of custom work, but im not building a space ship here. the chassis can stay around 97% intact, unlike say a Honda Civic which has been through the conversion and those guys had to run tunnel work all through the car before they can even address the issues i'm at. If I had a FWD car that has always been a FWD car and nothing else then this wouldn't be the smartest thing to do. I strongly believe that Toyota destroyed the Celica when they made it FWD, it was ment to be RWD or AWD and since Toyota was smart enough to make the GT-Four they made this task much easier. Also I don't build import performance cars for a living, I am a PC Technician, but I have enough people on my side that have built dirt track cars, stock cars, drag cars, drag bikes, Im friends with Gary Hargett (the man the got Dale Earnhart Sr. and Jr. racing) so I got the mechanics to help, I just would like to get help from the people that own, drive, and live for this car. As you can tell Kwanza obviously i'm no slouch when it comes to cars, import or domestic, so I highly believe this project is possible. Looks like you'll have to find out. |
Mar 16, 2005 - 6:26 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 20, '03 From Seattle, Washington Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
hi i just want to wish u luck and a few questions,
Would it be hard to go awd? and do just want RWD? Also would it be easier to make a custom driveshaft? Or use a olfer celicas RWD setup? Sry if this questions or stupuid or already answerd |
Mar 16, 2005 - 8:16 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Sep 28, '03 From Bloomington, IN Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Engines these days pratically swap themselves.
Step 1: Remove 5s/7a Step 2: Just toss 2jz in there. Turn up side down for that cool "angled exhuast" look. Step 3" Pour a few quarts of oil on engine. Step 4: Close hood. Give the celica about a week so the 2JZ can get use to being in there. That wasn't so hard, now was it? -------------------- NASA/SCCA RX-7....currently under the knife
92 Civic hatch B16 - Sold 10th anniv RX-7 - RIP The Slow Celica - Sold...and then crushed crushed due to street racing. Quote from Seinfeild: George's Boss reading a magazine: "People magazine's most beautiful people. Oh and a Celica...nothin wrong with that!" |
Mar 16, 2005 - 8:38 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 9, '03 From St. Louis Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
that was more useless than this post
-------------------- [img]http://photos-081.facebook.com/n6/081/n15913038_30266081_3342.jpg[/img]
|
Mar 16, 2005 - 9:00 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 19, '04 From Scottsdale, Az Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
I say good luck, and hopefully you achieve this, and if not post regardless, because someone in the future will try this and will learn from the experiences on websites like this.
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 24th, 2024 - 12:36 AM |