this is the sadest day known to man, timing belt broke |
this is the sadest day known to man, timing belt broke |
May 17, 2005 - 11:54 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 30, '02 From Nebraska Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Im sad to announce that the timing belt on my celica is now broken. Not too bad for going 160,000 miles on the orginal timing belt. This is either going to lead to either
1. new timing belt, head work on the 5sfe head, new clutch and new seals. or 2. 2.2 stroker with the 3sgte head. still trying to find parts for it. i bought a 3sgte head on ebay for $150. so if anyone has some stuff i need. let me know. either way im going to be doing alot of stuff my my celica soon. -------------------- 94 celica GT
90 Civic Si |
May 18, 2005 - 4:34 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 16, '03 From Bay area Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
why didn't you change it earlier?
i'm planning on changing my timing belt at 70k miles |
May 18, 2005 - 11:18 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 27, '04 Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
i'm at about 130k on my 2nd timing belt... about time to change it
-------------------- ~Daniel~ No Longer Celica Owner.. moved on to a 03 WRX-EJ207
|
May 18, 2005 - 12:28 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 22, '03 From Tracadie-Sheila, NB (Canada) Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
im about to change my timing belt soon (almost hit 70k with it)...do you huys know what else to change with the belt...any seals or something?
|
May 18, 2005 - 1:00 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 10, '03 From Wichita, KS Currently Offline Reputation: 5 (100%) |
might as well replace the water pump while you're at it.
-------------------- Project ST204.5 99.88946% complete... |
May 18, 2005 - 1:21 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Apr 22, '04 From Rhode Island Currently Offline Reputation: 3 (100%) |
im at 94000 and this is my 3rd timing belt
|
May 18, 2005 - 1:25 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 14, '05 From Auckland,New Zealand Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
Changed my timing belt at 90K. Its usually good to change it since it is not something you would change often. It should last me another 90k
Other things that they might change while changing the timing belt is the water pump and bearings(?) |
May 18, 2005 - 1:36 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 14, '03 From Jacksonville, FL Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
I replaced my second one around 115k.
Too bad my engine is dead now. -------------------- |
May 18, 2005 - 2:10 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 9, '03 From Dayton, OH Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
Did you know that you dont have a interference engine? Slap a new timming belt, tensioner, and water pump and go another 160k miles You have done no damage to your head or valves so why mess with them?
-------------------- |
May 18, 2005 - 2:49 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 26, '02 From Alabama Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
QUOTE(WannabeGT4 @ May 18, 2005 - 11:00 AM) might as well replace the water pump while you're at it. [right][snapback]288561[/snapback][/right] =best thing to do. |
May 18, 2005 - 6:12 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Sep 25, '03 From cranston RI Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(bufferdan @ May 18, 2005 - 2:10 PM) Did you know that you dont have a interference engine? Slap a new timming belt, tensioner, and water pump and go another 160k miles You have done no damage to your head or valves so why mess with them? [right][snapback]288600[/snapback][/right] defffffinetly replace the tensioner with it... like he said we have non interference engines, not harm is done. i had my timing belt changed, but didnt have the tensioner changed. about a month later the tensioner siezed up, and the timing belt shredded... so had to have it replaced again.. -------------------- |
May 18, 2005 - 10:59 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 30, '02 From Nebraska Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
i could have sworn we had interferance engines. well thats good that we dont. but i was sitting at a stop sign when the belt broke, so it wouldnt have done any damage. but yes i got a OEM from toyota belt, tensioner and something else with it too, not sure what it is off the top of my head. but i think im going to be going with the 2.2 stroker anyways. but if money comes a problem, ill just slap on the belt and new clutch and go.
-------------------- 94 celica GT
90 Civic Si |
May 18, 2005 - 11:23 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Apr 22, '04 From illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(mywhite94celicagt @ May 18, 2005 - 10:59 PM) i could have sworn we had interferance engines. well thats good that we dont. but i was sitting at a stop sign when the belt broke, so it wouldnt have done any damage. [right][snapback]288812[/snapback][/right] WOWSER-RIFFICK, this boy has one of them SPECIAL celica engines, the kind where the revolutions of the engines completely stop when the car is at a complete stop. Absolutly amazing technology these gosh-darn days. -------------------- The most important lesson I learned from Karate-Dō Kyōshan – “You can not be what you do not believe you are” |
May 20, 2005 - 12:15 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 16, '03 From Bay area Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Jen @ May 18, 2005 - 11:36 AM) I replaced my second one around 115k. Too bad my engine is dead now. [right][snapback]288575[/snapback][/right] what happened to jen's engine? |
May 20, 2005 - 6:46 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Apr 8, '05 From Norway Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(spunky393 @ May 18, 2005 - 11:23 PM) QUOTE(mywhite94celicagt @ May 18, 2005 - 10:59 PM) i could have sworn we had interferance engines. well thats good that we dont. but i was sitting at a stop sign when the belt broke, so it wouldnt have done any damage. [right][snapback]288812[/snapback][/right] WOWSER-RIFFICK, this boy has one of them SPECIAL celica engines, the kind where the revolutions of the engines completely stop when the car is at a complete stop. Absolutly amazing technology these gosh-darn days. [right][snapback]288817[/snapback][/right] Don't make fun of people like that -------------------- |
May 20, 2005 - 3:05 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 11, '03 From Kennesaw, Ga Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Illyont @ May 20, 2005 - 4:46 AM) QUOTE(spunky393 @ May 18, 2005 - 11:23 PM) QUOTE(mywhite94celicagt @ May 18, 2005 - 10:59 PM) i could have sworn we had interferance engines. well thats good that we dont. but i was sitting at a stop sign when the belt broke, so it wouldnt have done any damage. [right][snapback]288812[/snapback][/right] WOWSER-RIFFICK, this boy has one of them SPECIAL celica engines, the kind where the revolutions of the engines completely stop when the car is at a complete stop. Absolutly amazing technology these gosh-darn days. [right][snapback]288817[/snapback][/right] Don't make fun of people like that [right][snapback]289389[/snapback][/right] Yea, make fun of people like Illyont...lol...j/k |
May 23, 2005 - 1:37 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Sep 17, '03 From Tampa FL Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
thank goodness we have belts and not chains. If a chain broke wed have lotsa damage. mines 136k on 2nd timing belt. not changing until 180k.
-------------------- -97 Celica ST
-2001 Celica GTS dk blue mica 100hp per litre (GOT LIFT?) |
May 23, 2005 - 9:19 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 9, '03 From Dayton, OH Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
It has nothing to do with belt or chain...it has to do with engine design. Our engines are non-interference meaning when the belt breaks the valves do not smack the pistons from the timming jumping so far off. Most engines are interference whether they be belt or chain it makes no difference. Chains tend to go longer and usually they dont have 60k change intervals. Chains do break though and they can stretch causing bent vavles.
-------------------- |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 23rd, 2024 - 3:23 PM |