 The 3sgte..., compare |
  |
 Feb 19, 2006 - 11:06 PM
|
 
|
|
Enthusiast  Joined Jul 7, '04 From charlotte N.C. Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%)  |
QUOTE(x_itchy_b_x @ Feb 17, 2006 - 10:42 PM) [snapback]395601[/snapback] QUOTE(recneps @ Feb 16, 2006 - 10:53 PM) [snapback]395214[/snapback] stock for stock. the 4g63 is going to push the most hp without a doubt. IMO the 3s head just dosnt flow enough. which gen 3sgte are you talking about though. he 2nd gen is what people mostly have. and yeah the intake manifold is kinda restrictive. but on the newer 3s like the caldina that isnt a porblem. well so im told. yeah i was talking about the 2nd gen, the IM does flow horrible and im pretty much firmly against AFM when your trying to get maximum flow. but if im correct the 3rd gen 3s mas MAF? -------------------- Former: 96 GT 5 speed (i/p/e) Fate- rear ended by mack truck
00 GTS 6 speed (i/ Bored TB 63mm - 68.5mm w/ butterfly/ Ported IM/ IMG/ PFC/ Commander/ datalogit/ Ported & heat wrapped Header/ Decat/ UEGO/) 193FWHP 14.2(1/4mi) @98mph, 2.12 60ft (just intake, unbolted Exhaust, and gutted) Fate- side swipped by 18 wheeler at 75mph. Next: maybe an elise |
|
Feb 19, 2006 - 11:22 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Dec 25, '02 From Pittsburgh/Clairton, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
MAP, yes
AFM, and MAF are the same. --------------------  |
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 23rd, 2024 - 9:32 PM |