6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> GT versus ST Front brakes, Whats the difference
post Mar 1, 2006 - 3:23 PM
+Quote Post
scothaniel

Enthusiast
***
Joined May 1, '03
From Michigan
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




So whats the difference between the GT and ST front brakes?

I see the hub and knuckle are the same, but the caliper and rotors are not. Slight size increase for the GT?


--------------------
Scott
West Michigan
post Mar 1, 2006 - 3:33 PM
+Quote Post
LewFX



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 28, '05
From Redondo Beach, CA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 86 (100%)




gt brake pads are larger than st


--------------------
IPB Image
post Mar 1, 2006 - 3:44 PM
+Quote Post
Coomer



Administrator
*****
Joined Aug 23, '02
From Seattle, WA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 14 (100%)




The GT's front rotors are 277mm in diameter and 26mm thick, and the calipers are different to handle these rotors. The ST's front rotors are 255mm in diameter and 23mm thick.


--------------------
New Toyota project coming soon...
post Mar 1, 2006 - 7:33 PM
+Quote Post
scothaniel

Enthusiast
***
Joined May 1, '03
From Michigan
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Thats the info I was looking for - Thanks!


--------------------
Scott
West Michigan
post Mar 5, 2006 - 3:27 AM
+Quote Post
Batman722



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Mar 8, '04
From Newport, RI
Currently Offline

Reputation: 63 (99%)




other than just being bigger, are the GT front brakes really better than ST brakes ? is it just marginal or is a dramatic difference ?


--------------------
post Mar 5, 2006 - 3:36 AM
+Quote Post
Batman722



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Mar 8, '04
From Newport, RI
Currently Offline

Reputation: 63 (99%)




I am talking about only the front *


--------------------
post Mar 6, 2006 - 12:44 AM
+Quote Post
Batman722



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Mar 8, '04
From Newport, RI
Currently Offline

Reputation: 63 (99%)




QUOTE(Batman722 @ Mar 5, 2006 - 3:27 AM) [snapback]402812[/snapback]

other than just being bigger, are the GT front brakes really better than ST brakes ? is it just marginal or is a dramatic difference ?

?


--------------------
post Mar 6, 2006 - 3:29 PM
+Quote Post
Batman722



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Mar 8, '04
From Newport, RI
Currently Offline

Reputation: 63 (99%)




anyone ?


--------------------
post Mar 6, 2006 - 3:31 PM
+Quote Post
TheStreetzKing



Enthusiast
****
Joined Jun 19, '05
From New York
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




dustin u drive a gt and an st, u cant find outt??


--------------------
post Mar 6, 2006 - 3:37 PM
+Quote Post
Batman722



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Mar 8, '04
From Newport, RI
Currently Offline

Reputation: 63 (99%)




QUOTE(TheStreetzKing @ Mar 6, 2006 - 3:31 PM) [snapback]403476[/snapback]

dustin u drive a gt and an st, u cant find outt??

I am talking only the front with differences. The ST with the rear drums and the GT with disks are a big difference. The reason I am asking is I might be about to get some GT fronts to replace my ST fronts, I am wondering if it is worth it or just going to be basically the same.

need some opinions...


--------------------
post Mar 6, 2006 - 4:21 PM
+Quote Post
Jdog1385



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Apr 14, '03
From Long Island, N.Y.
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




QUOTE(Batman722 @ Mar 6, 2006 - 3:37 PM) [snapback]403480[/snapback]

QUOTE(TheStreetzKing @ Mar 6, 2006 - 3:31 PM) [snapback]403476[/snapback]

dustin u drive a gt and an st, u cant find outt??

I am talking only the front with differences. The ST with the rear drums and the GT with disks are a big difference. The reason I am asking is I might be about to get some GT fronts to replace my ST fronts, I am wondering if it is worth it or just going to be basically the same.

need some opinions...


if you have a larger rotor and bigger pads, the car will be able to stop in a shorter distance...im sure you knew that already. but the difference between 255mm and 277mm, however marginal, can make a big difference.

one reason not to do it is b/c you're not adding any hp to the motor so you really dont need more stopping power.
post Mar 6, 2006 - 4:22 PM
+Quote Post
lagos



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 31, '02
From Philadelphia, PA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 8 (100%)




id guess to say that since they are bigger then they are better, but you probably wont really notice the change. if anything i would consider upgrading your brake pads on the st


--------------------
15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
post Mar 6, 2006 - 4:44 PM
+Quote Post
scothaniel

Enthusiast
***
Joined May 1, '03
From Michigan
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




I thought manufactures based the size of the brakes primarily to vehicle weight for general applications (cars like the Evo and Vette not being considered general application).

Since the GT is heavier then the ST (according to edmunds) and Toyota considered the Celica's a general application, then using the GT brakes on a stock ST probably would not make much of a difference for the average driver. If you were pushing your brakes more then the average driver, you would probably get a little more out of the GT brakes - less fade when hot, etc... If you have an ST with a motor swap though, the GT brakes would probably help with the increased weight.

I was asking about the differences because I have a spare set of GT brakes in the garage and ST's fronts are shot - and the ST rotors are acutally more expensive then the GT's! Since its still snowing here I dont want to swap over to the GT4 fronts yet (snow tires wouldn't fit) but I need to do something to get through to spring.

This post has been edited by scothaniel: Mar 6, 2006 - 4:45 PM


--------------------
Scott
West Michigan
post Mar 6, 2006 - 5:27 PM
+Quote Post
Batman722



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Mar 8, '04
From Newport, RI
Currently Offline

Reputation: 63 (99%)




well I bought the 2 front GT calipers (rebuilt) with new pads for $80...now I need new rotors... kindasad.gif


--------------------
post Mar 6, 2006 - 5:46 PM
+Quote Post
Kwanza26



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Dec 27, '03
From Nor Cal
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




The actual contact surface on the pads and rotors are about the same. The caliper pistons are about the same. The only major difference is the diameter of the rotor. I'd say overall... it's mostly for looks...


--------------------
"It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"

1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver...

1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies...

1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be...
post Mar 6, 2006 - 6:42 PM
+Quote Post
scothaniel

Enthusiast
***
Joined May 1, '03
From Michigan
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE
now I need new rotors.


Nopi onlne has brembo's for pretty cheap.


--------------------
Scott
West Michigan
post Mar 6, 2006 - 7:10 PM
+Quote Post
JoKeRkId613

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Apr 25, '03
From Miami, FL
Currently Offline

Reputation: 9 (100%)




QUOTE(scothaniel @ Mar 6, 2006 - 2:44 PM) [snapback]403508[/snapback]
Since its still snowing here I dont want to swap over to the GT4 fronts yet (snow tires wouldn't fit) but I need to do something to get through to spring.
I thought GT4 front brakes wouldn't fit unless you have the entire SuperStrut setup... Also, isn't there more modification needed other than calipers and rotors to convert the front end of ST brakes to those of the GT?


--------------------
IPB Image
post Mar 6, 2006 - 8:50 PM
+Quote Post
scothaniel

Enthusiast
***
Joined May 1, '03
From Michigan
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Yeah, I've got the super-struts, fig 8's, etc..

The master cylinders are the same between models, but the booster and proportioning valves are different - nothing some wildwood replacements cant fix.


--------------------
Scott
West Michigan
post Mar 6, 2006 - 8:57 PM
+Quote Post
JoKeRkId613

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Apr 25, '03
From Miami, FL
Currently Offline

Reputation: 9 (100%)




QUOTE(scothaniel @ Mar 6, 2006 - 6:50 PM) [snapback]403604[/snapback]
Yeah, I've got the super-struts, fig 8's, etc..

The master cylinders are the same between models, but the booster and proportioning valves are different - nothing some wildwood replacements cant fix.
Cool. How hard is it to swap the entire suspension? Also, is the SuperStrut better? I hard they don't really have too many spring options. Is it possible to swap the rear suspension also?


--------------------
IPB Image
post Mar 6, 2006 - 9:48 PM
+Quote Post
scothaniel

Enthusiast
***
Joined May 1, '03
From Michigan
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




It's extremely easy to swap out. The springs are the same as the GT's, so there are options for upgrades.

The super-struts are supposed to be very good for auto-x, but the fig-8's are prone to break down. I've heard that quite a few people swap the struts out with standard struts.

Rears are only compatable with the awd system.


--------------------
Scott
West Michigan

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: April 23rd, 2025 - 9:10 AM