 dont mess with AMS, vid |
  |
 Jun 3, 2006 - 1:17 PM
|
 
|
 Enthusiast  Joined Aug 31, '02 From Philadelphia, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%)  |
-------------------- 15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
|
|
Jun 3, 2006 - 1:23 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Dec 16, '02 From New York Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) |
This post has been edited by ILuvMyCelica95: Jun 3, 2006 - 1:23 PM -------------------- Buy my Celica $2,500 - http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=76562&st=0
|
|
Jun 3, 2006 - 2:07 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 3, '05 From Hollywood, FL Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
not bad but im not a fan of dynos
-------------------- To live, is to suffer
To survive, thats to find meaning, in the suffering....  |
|
Jun 3, 2006 - 2:48 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Dec 8, '05 From torrance/carson, ca Currently Offline Reputation: 11 (100%) |
988 hp. eh, i guess that pretty fast. i mean, its not bad.... holy freaking crap that's fast.
-------------------- |
|
Jun 3, 2006 - 5:11 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Oct 12, '05 From Texas Currently Offline Reputation: 59 (100%) |
-------------------- Past: V6 Swapped 6G Celica, E46 BMW M3, Jeep Wrangler TJ
Current: 850rwhp C6 Corvette Grandsport, Gen1 6.2L Ford Raptor |
|
Jun 3, 2006 - 5:42 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Jun 4, '04 From Northern New Jersey Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
wow...very nice! i like how the turbo is positioned!
 bboy --------------------  ..(formerly daily driven) 3S-GTE powered celica currently set @ 12psi.. |
|
Jun 3, 2006 - 8:05 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Jul 19, '04 From Los Angeles, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
QUOTE(bloodrain @ Jun 3, 2006 - 12:07 PM) [snapback]440706[/snapback] not bad but im not a fan of dynos what do you mean your not a fan of dynos? that's like saying your not a fan of wrenches.... a dyno is a tool... amazing numbers there. This post has been edited by CheesyLobster: Jun 3, 2006 - 8:06 PM |
|
Jun 3, 2006 - 8:27 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Oct 13, '02 From Blairstown, New Jersey Currently Offline Reputation: 6 (100%) |
Whoa....thats scary how that thing slided back and forth on the rollers like that.
 Talk about top end power. -------------------- 3rd gen ST205 3SGTE - Alive and boosting. |
|
Jun 3, 2006 - 10:03 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Jun 30, '03 From O-town, FL Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Where's the torque?
-------------------- Sometimes we live to beat the odds.
- Ryan  aim: rkgreen04 |
|
Jun 4, 2006 - 12:01 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 13, '02 From Blairstown, New Jersey Currently Offline Reputation: 6 (100%) |
Its at the end of the video....it was like 600 something ft/lbs, I can't remember.
-------------------- 3rd gen ST205 3SGTE - Alive and boosting. |
|
Jun 4, 2006 - 2:04 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 30, '03 From O-town, FL Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I know, I'm just remarking at how there is very little torque.
-------------------- Sometimes we live to beat the odds.
- Ryan aim: rkgreen04 |
|
Jun 4, 2006 - 2:28 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 31, '02 From Philadelphia, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
QUOTE(Akimbo @ Jun 4, 2006 - 3:04 AM) [snapback]440858[/snapback] I know, I'm just remarking at how there is very little torque. what did you want? 1,000lb of tq? it makes over 600, thats ALOT of torque!!!! -------------------- 15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
|
|
Jun 4, 2006 - 2:38 AM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Jul 31, '05 From Southern California Currently Offline Reputation: 7 (100%) |
hmmm??? 635 ft/lbs is not a lot of torque when the car probably weighs around 2k lbs??? that still sounds pretty impressive to me... i wonder if the awd had something to do with it...
-------------------- |
|
Jun 4, 2006 - 3:07 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 30, '03 From O-town, FL Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I realize it's a LOT of torque, I just figured it'd have more considering it's HP numbers.
-------------------- Sometimes we live to beat the odds.
- Ryan aim: rkgreen04 |
|
Jun 4, 2006 - 3:40 AM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Aug 30, '02 From Anaheim, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Akimbo @ Jun 4, 2006 - 1:07 AM) [snapback]440874[/snapback] I realize it's a LOT of torque, I just figured it'd have more considering it's HP numbers. when you have almost 1000hp, it doesnt matter that you have a little over half that value in torque. that car is an 8second car if they can get it down the strip cleanly airfron that car weighs a lot more than 2000lbs. its probably just above 3000lbs This post has been edited by 97sccelica: Jun 4, 2006 - 3:44 AM -------------------- 1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram |
|
Jun 4, 2006 - 4:19 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 31, '05 From Southern California Currently Offline Reputation: 7 (100%) |
QUOTE(97sccelica @ Jun 4, 2006 - 1:40 AM) [snapback]440876[/snapback] QUOTE(Akimbo @ Jun 4, 2006 - 1:07 AM) [snapback]440874[/snapback] I realize it's a LOT of torque, I just figured it'd have more considering it's HP numbers. when you have almost 1000hp, it doesnt matter that you have a little over half that value in torque. that car is an 8second car if they can get it down the strip cleanly airfron that car weighs a lot more than 2000lbs. its probably just above 3000lbs ok.. was just guessin... its prolly close to 3k considering a stock evo is about 3200 w/passenger and it had some weight red. i'm sure but doesn't look too drastic found another vid from ams but not as high of hp http://www.ka-t.org/klattr1/amsevobreak900.zip This post has been edited by airfron: Jun 4, 2006 - 4:22 AM -------------------- |
|
Jun 4, 2006 - 4:24 AM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Mar 17, '05 From The Netherlands Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(97sccelica @ Jun 4, 2006 - 10:40 AM) [snapback]440876[/snapback] QUOTE(Akimbo @ Jun 4, 2006 - 1:07 AM) [snapback]440874[/snapback] I realize it's a LOT of torque, I just figured it'd have more considering it's HP numbers. that car weighs a lot more than 2000lbs. its probably just above 3000lbs Haven,t you noticed the strip interior and rollcage. No way 3000 lbs -------------------- JDM Powerplant installed, BPU coming very soon!
 |
|
Jun 4, 2006 - 12:32 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 30, '02 From Anaheim, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Kadett @ Jun 4, 2006 - 2:24 AM) [snapback]440885[/snapback] QUOTE(97sccelica @ Jun 4, 2006 - 10:40 AM) [snapback]440876[/snapback] QUOTE(Akimbo @ Jun 4, 2006 - 1:07 AM) [snapback]440874[/snapback] I realize it's a LOT of torque, I just figured it'd have more considering it's HP numbers. that car weighs a lot more than 2000lbs. its probably just above 3000lbs Haven,t you noticed the strip interior and rollcage. No way 3000 lbs evo rs, factory stripped, no power anything, gutted trunk, weighs 3175 evo and evo mr weigh 3263 so when an evo loses the wing, guts the trunk and removes power accessories, it weighs 3175. lets say that removing the back seat, door panels and carpet takes out another 100lbs. that puts the car at 3075. then lets say removing AC is another 50lbs. and upgrading to aftermarket exhaust puts it at another 25lbs lighter 3000lbs by taking stuff off. now lets talk about the stuff they added roll cage easily weighs over 100lbs the turbo they put on weighs probably a good 25 lbs more than the stock turbo and that new turbo manifold weighs probably the same as the stock one, if not more. add in about 10lbs for the wastegate setup that would put the car at 3135lbs and looking at the video again, i noticed that the car still has doorpanels, atleast on the front doors, and its not an RS so it has power windows can you think of anything signifigant that i missed in making my original judgement that that evo weighs about 3000lbs?
-------------------- 1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram |
|
Jun 4, 2006 - 12:46 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 31, '05 From Southern California Currently Offline Reputation: 7 (100%) |
QUOTE(97sccelica @ Jun 4, 2006 - 10:32 AM) [snapback]440954[/snapback] QUOTE(Kadett @ Jun 4, 2006 - 2:24 AM) [snapback]440885[/snapback] QUOTE(97sccelica @ Jun 4, 2006 - 10:40 AM) [snapback]440876[/snapback] QUOTE(Akimbo @ Jun 4, 2006 - 1:07 AM) [snapback]440874[/snapback] I realize it's a LOT of torque, I just figured it'd have more considering it's HP numbers. that car weighs a lot more than 2000lbs. its probably just above 3000lbs Haven,t you noticed the strip interior and rollcage. No way 3000 lbs evo rs, factory stripped, no power anything, gutted trunk, weighs 3175 evo and evo mr weigh 3263 so when an evo loses the wing, guts the trunk and removes power accessories, it weighs 3175. lets say that removing the back seat, door panels and carpet takes out another 100lbs. that puts the car at 3075. then lets say removing AC is another 50lbs. and upgrading to aftermarket exhaust puts it at another 25lbs lighter 3000lbs by taking stuff off. now lets talk about the stuff they added roll cage easily weighs over 100lbs the turbo they put on weighs probably a good 25 lbs more than the stock turbo and that new turbo manifold weighs probably the same as the stock one, if not more. add in about 10lbs for the wastegate setup that would put the car at 3135lbs and looking at the video again, i noticed that the car still has doorpanels, atleast on the front doors, and its not an RS so it has power windows can you think of anything signifigant that i missed in making my original judgement that that evo weighs about 3000lbs?  ehhh buddy you do good job!!!1! your powers of weight deduction are inconceivablish-------------------- |
|
Jun 4, 2006 - 10:08 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 31, '02 From Philadelphia, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
who cares about the weight? the thing makes almost 1,000 hp . it dosnt really matter if its 3000-4000lb. it WILL haul ass.
-------------------- 15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: December 4th, 2024 - 8:42 PM |