6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> stallownt, judge judy owns scam artist
post Feb 23, 2007 - 10:22 PM
+Quote Post
jayi12-15psi

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 9, '03
From St. Louis
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWfshl8_wSM


--------------------
[img]http://photos-081.facebook.com/n6/081/n15913038_30266081_3342.jpg[/img]
post Feb 23, 2007 - 11:51 PM
+Quote Post
devilsden97



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jun 13, '05
From Poughkeepsie, NY
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




2 cellphone photos on ebay: $457.00

Gas to get to court: $36.50

Makeup and hairspray: $25

Getting PWND on national televison for the tune of $5,0000: PRICELESS


Somethings money cant buy, for everything else, theres ebay scammers getting owned!


--------------------

Kawi Love
post Feb 24, 2007 - 12:46 AM
+Quote Post
CelicaBuddy

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Nov 1, '04
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




laugh.gif

owned.gif


--------------------

1995 Convertible Celica
2003 Nissan Murano SE
post Feb 24, 2007 - 1:36 AM
+Quote Post
97lestyousay



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jul 7, '03
Currently Offline

Reputation: 55 (100%)




She got what she deserved. I personally can't stand
Judge Judy though. She has brains in her finger. laugh.gif



--------------------
JDM guy made me do it.
post Feb 24, 2007 - 1:38 AM
+Quote Post
Jen



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jul 14, '03
From Jacksonville, FL
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




haha judge judy is amazing.

question though, why $5,000?


--------------------
YoungSurvival.Org
-

Celica traded for.. 350z.. traded for Mazda5.. soccer mom!
post Feb 24, 2007 - 1:40 AM
+Quote Post
Batman722



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Mar 8, '04
From Newport, RI
Currently Offline

Reputation: 63 (99%)




QUOTE(97lestyousay @ Feb 24, 2007 - 1:36 AM) [snapback]529849[/snapback]

She got what she deserved. I personally can't stand
Judge Judy though. She has brains in her finger. laugh.gif

I agree with you Randy, I would smack the crap out of JJ if she ever talked to me like that. I got brains, right here wink.gif

then again, if the ad says it's for a photo, then you're buying a photo...buyer beware


--------------------
post Feb 24, 2007 - 9:55 AM
+Quote Post
massbrandon



Enthusiast
****
Joined Mar 6, '06
From massachusetts
Currently Offline

Reputation: 30 (97%)




Dustin, JJ would own you and everyone else lol. That lady got what she deserved
post Feb 24, 2007 - 11:28 AM
+Quote Post
jason



Enthusiast
****
Joined Oct 7, '06
From wyomissing pennsylvania
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




oh boy here we go very funny though laugh.gif


--------------------
you know why they put sheep at the edge of a cliff.... that way they push back!
IPB Image
IPB Image
IPB Image
IPB Image
(2:27:32 AM) edit: please f*cking work, f*ck, sh*t, piss
(2:28:08 AM) edit: that did the trick
post Feb 24, 2007 - 11:59 AM
+Quote Post
jgreening

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 17, '04
From Illinois
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE(Batman722 @ Feb 24, 2007 - 12:40 AM) [snapback]529852[/snapback]

then again, if the ad says it's for a photo, then you're buying a photo...buyer beware


You probably just mean that people need to be careful which is certainly true. However, "buyer beware" or "caveat emptor" comes from the common law indicating that so long as the seller does not misrepresent something, the buyer has no legal rememdy. That is not true today as most (if not all) states have statutes which prohibit deceptive business practices. These statutes pre-empt the common law. It does not matter that the ad says the auction is for a photo. It is deceptive in that the intent was to get people's money because potential buyers might THINK it was a real phone. The intent of the advertiser is what is important. Although I think JJ is a prima dona of the worst sort, she got this one right.

As for the question above regarding the $5000 judgement, I presume that is the maximum allowed in small claims court in the applicable state. The plaintiff would have been entitled to more than the value spent due to the defamation issue as the seller had falsly reported feedback.


--------------------
QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback]

i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this.
post Feb 24, 2007 - 4:43 PM
+Quote Post
Supersprynt



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Feb 10, '03
From Connecticut
Currently Offline

Reputation: 11 (100%)




Jays right. Its the maximum allowed in small claims. She did this maximum to basically send a message to all scam artists that this is intolerable.

JJ lives around here, not sure but I think the next town over.


--------------------
post Feb 25, 2007 - 8:35 PM
+Quote Post
dustin15brown



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 17, '03
From Bloomington, Indiana
Currently Offline

Reputation: 62 (98%)




I laughed... a lot... although JJ was kinda a bia


--------------------

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: February 17th, 2025 - 3:08 AM