6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> whats better
post Aug 30, 2007 - 8:00 PM
+Quote Post
94veilsidecelica



Enthusiast

Joined Aug 27, '07
From Connecticut
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




what is better the st185 or the st205 motor?
post Aug 30, 2007 - 10:01 PM
+Quote Post
3rdgen3SGTE

Enthusiast
*
Joined Nov 21, '05
From Quebec
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




st205

so st185 is more funny for part in U.S


--------------------
Celica GTS turbo 1994
3sgte genIII Ct20b
post Aug 31, 2007 - 2:44 PM
+Quote Post
95celgt



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Oct 5, '03
From South TX.
Currently Offline

Reputation: 14 (100%)




3rdgen3sgte: Your comment on the 185 motor makes no sense what so ever...

As for the topic, it depends....i think the 185 motor is more cost-effective, because regardless, if you want to make good numbers you have to switch to a standalone ECU....
post Aug 31, 2007 - 8:27 PM
+Quote Post
toyotacrazy

Enthusiast
***
Joined Mar 4, '06
From Ohio
Currently Offline

Reputation: 10 (100%)




QUOTE(3rdgen3SGTE @ Aug 30, 2007 - 10:01 PM) [snapback]592289[/snapback]

st205

so st185 is more funny for part in U.S

What I think he means is
"st185 parts are readily avalible in the US. or more cost effective".....crap I donno! laugh.gif
post Aug 31, 2007 - 8:44 PM
+Quote Post
95celgt



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Oct 5, '03
From South TX.
Currently Offline

Reputation: 14 (100%)




lol, cool deal, it is anyway:P
post Sep 1, 2007 - 5:27 PM
+Quote Post
toyotacrazy

Enthusiast
***
Joined Mar 4, '06
From Ohio
Currently Offline

Reputation: 10 (100%)




QUOTE(95celgt @ Aug 31, 2007 - 8:44 PM) [snapback]592536[/snapback]

lol, cool deal, it is anyway:P

HUH??????
post Sep 1, 2007 - 5:33 PM
+Quote Post
95celgt



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Oct 5, '03
From South TX.
Currently Offline

Reputation: 14 (100%)




as in, it is more available to us US residents. and its cheaper.
post Sep 1, 2007 - 5:46 PM
+Quote Post
manphibian



Moderator
*****
Joined Oct 13, '06
From UK
Currently Offline

Reputation: 6 (100%)




The 205 is far better.

standard 205s run 250-280hp, standard 185s are a fair bit lower 180-220hp

Main improvements to 205:

Revised sump and baffling - to include engine/gearbox bracing
Revised oil system - pressure regulator and oil pump
Revised head - shim under bucket, different exhaust cam
Revised intake manifold - junks TVIS, different sized entry ports, larger throttle body
Different pistons - different material and CR
Metal head gasket
Fuel system - Larger injectors, different fuel rail
Management - better ECU, ditched AFM (hurrah!)
Turbo - bigger and runs more pressure
Revised intercooling - back to WTA system, with a dump valve
Revised PCV system - catch can fitted with drain


--------------------
post Sep 1, 2007 - 9:42 PM
+Quote Post
toyotacrazy

Enthusiast
***
Joined Mar 4, '06
From Ohio
Currently Offline

Reputation: 10 (100%)




QUOTE(manphibian @ Sep 1, 2007 - 5:46 PM) [snapback]592695[/snapback]

The 205 is far better.

standard 205s run 250-280hp, standard 185s are a fair bit lower 180-220hp

Main improvements to 205:

Revised sump and baffling - to include engine/gearbox bracing
Revised oil system - pressure regulator and oil pump
Revised head - shim under bucket, different exhaust cam
Revised intake manifold - junks TVIS, different sized entry ports, larger throttle body
Different pistons - different material and CR
Metal head gasket
Fuel system - Larger injectors, different fuel rail
Management - better ECU, ditched AFM (hurrah!)
Turbo - bigger and runs more pressure
Revised intercooling - back to WTA system, with a dump valve
Revised PCV system - catch can fitted with drain

agreed. You have some good poings there. The removal of the maf is a biggie! I hate mine!

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: November 29th, 2024 - 8:33 AM