5sfe stock hp |
5sfe stock hp |
Feb 3, 2008 - 11:57 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 18, '07 From Orange County, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 3 (100%) |
hello guys,
just wondering when 5sfe supposingly says it's 135hp, is it really 135 hp? and what's the difference between hp and whp? i was wondering 'cause I heard the gains from cams is 20-30 hp. so, if I had colt cams and injen sri, could i claim 160 hp. just don't wanna say I have around 160 hp and bs myself . thanks -------------------- |
Feb 4, 2008 - 12:23 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 14, '07 From Provo, UT USA Currently Offline Reputation: 25 (100%) |
QUOTE(JasonX @ Feb 3, 2008 - 9:57 PM) [snapback]637719[/snapback] hello guys, just wondering when 5sfe supposingly says it's 135hp, is it really 135 hp? and what's the difference between hp and whp? i was wondering 'cause I heard the gains from cams is 20-30 hp. so, if I had colt cams and injen sri, could i claim 160 hp. just don't wanna say I have around 160 hp and bs myself . thanks the diff between hp and whp is hp is the power to the crank where whp is power to the wheels. i believe the also call it bhp or braking horse power. as far as i know the 5sfe has a measly 110 whp if that -------------------- |
Feb 4, 2008 - 12:58 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 19, '07 From Washington Currently Offline Reputation: 9 (100%) |
QUOTE(Batman722 @ Jan 12, 2008 - 4:55 AM) [snapback]630164[/snapback] 1995 GT 158K miles 2.2l 5s-fe hardwelded camshafts (grind 294) header, cat back exhaust 123.59 hp @ 5811 rpm 126.84 tq @ 4179 rpm the closest dyno test to stock hp for the 5sfe I've seen on here. -------------------- |
Feb 4, 2008 - 6:35 AM |
|
Moderator Joined Oct 1, '02 From fall river, ma Currently Offline Reputation: 13 (100%) |
QUOTE(JasonX @ Feb 3, 2008 - 11:57 PM) [snapback]637719[/snapback] hello guys, just wondering when 5sfe supposingly says it's 135hp, is it really 135 hp? and what's the difference between hp and whp? i was wondering 'cause I heard the gains from cams is 20-30 hp. so, if I had colt cams and injen sri, could i claim 160 hp. just don't wanna say I have around 160 hp and bs myself . thanks its 135 FLYWHEEL hp. dustins dyno is WHEEL hp. 2 diffrent things. -------------------- Former Team 5SFTE pro member ;)
13.6@108MPH, 5SFTE Powered |
Feb 4, 2008 - 10:26 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 19, '07 From Washington Currently Offline Reputation: 9 (100%) |
^^^ I know, but it's the hp to the wheel that actually counts
also thought it would be useful to answering the question. This post has been edited by 96bluevert: Feb 4, 2008 - 10:27 AM -------------------- |
Feb 4, 2008 - 11:09 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 22, '05 From Mesquite, Texas Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (50%) |
Do not overlook Dustin's mod's that he has to his celica at the time of the dyno.
It claims he had: hardwelded camshafts (grind 294) header, cat back exhaust Now that to me, is by no means STOCK. 135 crank HP might be found in a well maintained slightly high mileage 5SFE, but for a typically abused motor with over 100XXX one can only fathom the loss of HP. Basically, the only way you can get a real look at your HP is to dyno your car, everyone has different results, even with the same mods. |
Feb 4, 2008 - 5:10 PM |
|
Moderator Joined Oct 1, '02 From fall river, ma Currently Offline Reputation: 13 (100%) |
heres what a good condition, lower mile 5s will look like on the dyno.
this is with a injen short ram intake only. this is from my car, pre turbo. the engine had under 55K on it.
Attached image(s)
-------------------- Former Team 5SFTE pro member ;)
13.6@108MPH, 5SFTE Powered |
Feb 4, 2008 - 8:58 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 18, '07 From Orange County, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 3 (100%) |
on this dyno what's the line that initially starts low, and what's the higher one?
This post has been edited by JasonX: Feb 4, 2008 - 8:58 PM -------------------- |
Feb 6, 2008 - 7:09 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 27, '04 Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
I don't know if I have my dyno sheet but I got 99 whp with a short ram intake and muffler only... pretty much stock..
-------------------- ~Daniel~ No Longer Celica Owner.. moved on to a 03 WRX-EJ207
|
Feb 6, 2008 - 11:42 PM |
|
Moderator Joined Nov 5, '07 From New Zealand Currently Offline Reputation: 3 (100%) |
the top one is for torque(unless we all have 125HP at idle)[use the right axis to find the reading]
the lower one that starts off is the power (HP)[use the left axis to find a reading] so looking at rpm (right down the bottom) 90HP @ 3750rpm (hope I dont sound like a school teacher) -------------------- |
Feb 7, 2008 - 12:28 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 27, '03 From Nor Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(JasonX @ Feb 5, 2008 - 1:58 AM) [snapback]638065[/snapback] on this dyno what's the line that initially starts low, and what's the higher one? The first dyno is not what a stock 5SFE dyno looks like. That's vastly improved over stock by about 10-20whp depending on the motor's condition, and the torque curve is significantly better. Typical 5SFE's will run out of breath around 4500 rpms and the torque dips significantly. The top dyno doesn't lose much torque until around 5300-5400 rpms. That is a significant difference in terms of accelerating the car. IMO, whoever that dyno belongs to, can still squeeze extra power with some good cam tuning. As far as which is which, the flatter line that starts flat is usually the torque (applies to most engines) and the line that climbs as the rpms increase is horsepower. -------------------- "It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"
1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver... 1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies... 1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be... |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: December 12th, 2024 - 5:18 AM |